PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Subramaniam, Ashwin
AU  - Reddy, Mallikarjuna
AU  - Zubarev, Alexander
AU  - Kadam, Umesh
AU  - Lim, Zhengjie
AU  - Anstey, Chris
AU  - Bihari, Shailesh
AU  - HAji, Jumana
AU  - Karunanithi, Subhathra
AU  - Ramanathan, Kollengode
AU  - Luo, Jinghang
AU  - Mara, Neil
AU  - Mitra, Saikat
AU  - Rajamani, Arvind
AU  - Rubulotta, Francesca
AU  - Svensk, Erik
AU  - Shekar, Kiran
TI  - Development and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention strategies in healthcare workers
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.14.20130682
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.14.20130682
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/16/2020.06.14.20130682.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/16/2020.06.14.20130682.full
AB  - Background Clinical guidelines on infection prevention strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are not comprehensive and are ambiguous may compromise HCWs’ safety. We aimed to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection prevention strategies in HCWs.Methods A 3-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was utilised. We validated the tool by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income.Results Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The chosen domains allowed appraisal of guidelines in relation to general characteristics (domain-1), recommendations on engineering (domain-2) and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection prevention, as well as personal protection equipment (PPE) use (domain-3). The appraisal tool performed well across all domains and inter-rater agreement was excellent. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 compared with domains 4-6 and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries.Conclusion The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Recommendations on engineering aspects of infection prevention, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high quality HCW infection prevention guidelines during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.Funding No funding received.Key Summary We developed and validated a guideline-appraisal tool by appraising 40 different guidelines from countries with varying GNI. This tool may help healthcare systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection-prevention guidelines during COVID-19 pandemic and may also provide a guideline development framework.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Trialn/aFunding Statementn/aAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:n/aAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis study does not contain patient information. This study is about developing and validating a guideline appraisal tool for infection prevention in COVID-19