RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.15.20129080
DO 10.1101/2020.06.15.20129080
A1 Denning, Max
A1 Goh, Ee Teng
A1 Clarke, Jonathan
A1 Almonte, Melanie
A1 Chidambaram, Swathikan
A1 Przybylowicz, Jan
A1 Sounderajah, Viknesh
A1 Flott, Kelsey
A1 Tan, Benjamin
A1 Yalamanchili, Seema
A1 Winter-Beatty, Jasmine
A1 Scott, Alasdair
A1 Martin, Guy
A1 Markar, Sheraz
A1 Wells, Mary
A1 Purkayastha, Sanjay
A1 Kinross, James
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/16/2020.06.15.20129080.abstract
AB Introduction Covid-19 has placed an unprecedented demand on healthcare systems worldwide. A positive safety culture is associated with improved patient safety and in turn patient outcomes. To date, no study has evaluated the impact of Covid-19 on safety culture.Methods The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to investigate safety culture at a large UK teaching hospital during Covid-19. Findings were compared with baseline data from 2017. Incident reporting from the year preceding the pandemic was also examined.Results Significant increases were seen in SAQ score for doctors (p<0.001) and AHPs (p<0.001) from baseline. A decrease in SAQ was found in the nursing group. Largely due to ‘perception of management’ and ‘safety climate’ subscales. During Covid-19, on univariate regression analysis, female gender (p<0.001), age 40-49 years (p<0.01), non-white ethnicity (p<0.001), nursing job role (p<0.001) were all associated with lower SAQ scores. Training (p<0.001) and support (p<0.001) for redeployment were associated with higher SAQ scores. On multivariate analysis, non-disclosed gender (−0.13), non-disclosed ethnicity (−0.11), nursing role (−0.15), and support (0.29) persisted to significance. A significant decrease (p<0.003) was seen in error reporting after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.Discussion Differences in reported safety culture may reflect perception of risk due to: occupational exposure, job function, or access to support services. Reductions in incident reporting may be due to increased workload, change in nature of work, or changing safety attitudes. Targeted high-quality support for redeployed staff may help improve safety during future pandemics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Odpo1iASbNKS8od4NrmEkh6q2QjpFHfX/view Funding StatementNo funding was received in support of this paper. Johnson and Johnson have supported the activities of the Pansurg collaborative with an educational grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Imperial College Research Ethics Committee Reference:20IC5890All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data will also be presented on the Pansurg website (link provided below). https://www.pansurg.org/ssafe/