PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Doung-ngern, Pawinee
AU  - Suphanchaimat, Repeepong
AU  - Panjangampatthana, Apinya
AU  - Janekrongtham, Chawisar
AU  - Ruampoom, Duangrat
AU  - Daochaeng, Nawaporn
AU  - Eungkanit, Napatchakorn
AU  - Pisitpayat, Nichakul
AU  - Srisong, Nuengruethai
AU  - Yasopa, Oiythip
AU  - Plernprom, Patchanee
AU  - Promduangsi, Pitiphon
AU  - Kumphon, Panita
AU  - Suangtho, Paphanij
AU  - Watakulsin, Peeriya
AU  - Chaiya, Sarinya
AU  - Kripattanapong, Somkid
AU  - Chantian, Thanawadee
AU  - Namwat, Chawetsan
AU  - Limmathurotsakul, Direk
TI  - Associations between wearing masks, washing hands, and social distancing practices, and risk of COVID-19 infection in public: a cohort-based case-control study in Thailand
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.11.20128900
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.11.20128900
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/15/2020.06.11.20128900.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/15/2020.06.11.20128900.full
AB  - Objective To investigate whether wearing masks, washing hands and social distancing practices are associated with lower risk of COVID-19 infection.Design A retrospective cohort-based case-control study. All participants were retrospectively interviewed by phone about their preventive measures against COVID-19 infection.Setting Thailand, using the data from contact tracing of COVID-19 patients associated with nightclub, boxing stadium and state enterprise office clusters from the Surveillance Rapid Response Team, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Contacts were tested for COVID-19 using PCR assays per national contact tracing guidelines.Participants A cohort of 1,050 asymptomatic contacts of COVID-19 patients between 1 and 31 March 2020.Main outcome measures Diagnosis of COVID-19 by 21 April 2020. Odds ratios for COVID-19 infection and population attributable fraction were calculated.Exposure The study team retrospectively asked about wearing masks, washing hands, and social distancing practices during the contact period through telephone interviews.Results Overall, 211 (20%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 by 21 Apr 2020 (case group) while 839 (80%) were not (control group). Fourteen percent of cases (29/210) and 24% of controls (198/823) reported wearing either non-medical or medical masks all the time during the contact period. Wearing masks all the time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.23; 95%CI 0.09-0.60) was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 infections compared to not wearing masks, while wearing masks sometimes (aOR 0.87; 95%CI 0.41-1.84) was not. Shortest distance of contact >1 meter (aOR 0.15; 95%CI 0.04-0.63), duration of close contact ≤15 minutes (aOR 0.24; 95%CI 0.07-0.90) and washing hands often (aOR 0.33; 95%CI 0.13-0.87) were significantly associated with lower risk of infection. Sharing a cigarette (aOR 3.47; 95%CI 1.09-11.02) was associated with higher risk of infection. Type of mask was not independently associated with risk of infection. Those who wore masks all the time were more likely to wash hands and practice social distancing. We estimated that if everyone wore a mask all the time, washed hands often, did not share a dish, cup or cigarette, had shortest distance of contact >1 meter and had duration of close contact ≤15 minutes, cases would have been reduced by 84%.Conclusions Our findings support consistently wearing non-medical masks, washing hands, and social distancing in public to prevent COVID-19 infections.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by the Department of Disease Control (DDC), Ministry of PUblic Health (MoPH) Thailand. DL is supported by the Wellcome Trust (106698/Z/14/Z).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:As this study is part of the routine situation analysis and outbreak investigation of the Department of Disease Control (DDC), Ministry of PUblic Health (MoPH) Thailand, it was not required to obtain ethics approval and no written informed consent was collected. However, the study team strictly followed ethical standards in research, that is, all individual information was strictly kept confidential and not reported in the paper. The DDC MoPH Thailand approved the analysis and reporting of data in aggregate.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data in aggregate are reported in the manuscript.