PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wang, Linwei AU - Ma, Huiting AU - Yiu, Kristy C.Y. AU - Calzavara, Andrew AU - Landsman, David AU - Luong, Linh AU - Chan, Adrienne K. AU - Kustra, Rafal AU - Kwong, Jeffrey C AU - Boily, Marie-Claude AU - Hwang, Stephen AU - Straus, Sharon AU - Baral, Stefan D AU - Mishra, Sharmistha TI - Heterogeneity in risk, testing and outcome of COVID-19 across outbreak settings in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an observational study AID - 10.1101/2020.06.12.20129783 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.12.20129783 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.12.20129783.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.12.20129783.full AB - Background We compared the risk of, testing for, and death following COVID-19 infection across three settings (long-term care homes (LTCH), shelters, the rest of the population) in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), Canada.Methods We sourced person-level data from COVID-19 surveillance and reporting systems in Ontario, and examined settings with population-specific denominators (LTCH residents, shelters, and the rest of the population). We calculated cumulatively, the diagnosed cases per capita, proportion tested for COVID-19, daily and cumulative positivity, and case fatality proportion. We estimated the age- and sex-adjusted relative rate ratios for test positivity and case fatality using quasi-Poisson regression.Results Between 01/23/2020-05/25/2020, we observed a shift in the proportion of cases: from travel-related and into LTCH and shelters. Cumulatively, compared to the rest of the population, the number of diagnosed cases per 100,000 was 59-fold and 18-fold higher among LTCH and shelter residents, respectively. By 05/25/2020, 77.2% of LTCH residents compared to 2.4% of the rest of the population had been tested. After adjusting for age and sex, LTCH residents were 2.5 times (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-2.8) more likely to test positive. Case fatality was 26.3% (915/3485), 0.7% (3/402), and 3.6% (506/14133) among LTCH residents, shelter population, and others in the GTA, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, case fatality was 1.4-fold (95%CI: 1.1-1.9) higher among LTCH residents than the rest of the population.Interpretation Heterogeneity across micro-epidemics among specific populations in specific settings may reflect underlying heterogeneity in transmission risks, necessitating setting-specific COVID-19 prevention and mitigation strategies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant (FN 13455), the Ontario Early Researcher Award (ER17-13-043), and the St. Michael's Hospital Foundation Research Innovation Council's 2020 COVID-19 Centre Research Award.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Reported COVID-19 cases were obtained from the Public Health Ontario (PHO) integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS), via the Ontario COVID-19 Modelling Consensus Table, and with approval from the University of Toronto Health Sciences REB (protocol No. 39253).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe findings of this study are supported by 1) data from the Public Health Ontario (PHO) integrated Public Health Information System (iPHIS), 2) the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care Long-Term Care Homes Tracker; and 3) the Ontario Laboratories Information System (OLIS). The iPHIS and Long-Term Care Homes Tracker were accessed via the Ontario COVID-19 Modelling Consensus Table. The OLIS data were accessed via ICES. In addition, data that are sourced publicly are made available in the paper as appendix or as per the referenced links.