PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Leng, Trystan
AU  - White, Connor
AU  - Hilton, Joe
AU  - Kucharski, Adam
AU  - Pellis, Lorenzo
AU  - Stage, Helena
AU  - Davies, Nick
AU - CMMID-Covid-19 WG
AU  - Keeling, Matt J.
AU  - Flasche, Stefan
TI  - The effectiveness of social bubbles as part of a Covid-19 lockdown exit strategy, a modelling study
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.05.20123448
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.05.20123448
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.05.20123448.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.05.20123448.full
AB  - Background During the Covid-19 lockdown, contact clustering in social bubbles may allow extending contacts beyond the household at minimal additional risk and hence has been considered as part of modified lockdown policy or a gradual lockdown exit strategy. We estimated the impact of such strategies on epidemic and mortality risk using the UK as a case study.Methods We used an individual based model for a synthetic population similar to the UK, that is stratified into transmission risks from the community, within the household and from other households in the same social bubble. The base case considers a situation where non-essential shops and schools are closed, the secondary household attack rate is 20% and the initial reproduction number is 0.8. We simulate a number of strategies including variations of social bubbles, i.e. the forming of exclusive pairs of households, for particular subsets of households (households including children and single occupancy households), as well as for all households. We test the sensitivity of the results to a range of alternative model assumptions and parameters.Results Clustering contacts outside the household into exclusive social bubbles is an effective strategy of increasing contacts while limiting some of the associated increase in epidemic risk. In the base case scenario social bubbles reduced cases and fatalities by 17% compared to an unclustered increase of contacts. We find that if all households were to form social bubbles the reproduction number would likely increase to 1.1 and therefore beyond the epidemic threshold of one. However, strategies that allow households with young children or single occupancy households to form social bubbles only increased the reproduction number by less than 10%. The corresponding increase in morbidity and mortality is proportional to the increase in the epidemic risk but is largely focussed in older adults independently of whether these are included in the social bubbles.Conclusions Social bubbles can be an effective way of extending contacts beyond the household limiting the increase in epidemic risk, if managed appropriately.Competing Interest StatementSF has a 5yold daughter. All other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementSF is funded through a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant Number 208812/Z/17/Z). TL and CW are funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Medical Research Council through the MathSys CDT (grant EP/L015374/1). AJK was supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (grant Number 206250/Z/17/Z). This research was partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care (Health Protection Research Unit for Modelling Methodology HPRU-2012-10096: NGD)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work does not need any approval of the IRB.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe simulation model and analyses from this study are available via github on ​ github.com/tsleng93/SocialBubble​ https://github.com/tsleng93/SocialBubble