RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Ozone therapy for patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia: a single-center prospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.03.20117994
DO 10.1101/2020.06.03.20117994
A1 Hernández, A
A1 Viñals, M
A1 Pablos, A
A1 Vilas, F
A1 Papadakos, PJ
A1 Wijeysundera, D.N
A1 Vives, M
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.03.20117994.abstract
AB Importance Aside from supportive management, there remains no specific treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Objective Determine whether ozonated autohemotherapy is associated with a shorter time to clinical improvement in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.Design Single-center proof-of-concept prospective cohort study.Setting Internal Medicine ward at Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Spain.Participants Eighteen consecutive patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 infection and severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospital between 20th March and 19th April 2020.Exposures Patients in the ozonated autohemotherapy arm received hemotherapy twice daily starting on the day of admission for a median of 4 days. Each treatment involved administration of 200 mL autologous whole blood enriched with 200 mL of oxygen-ozone mixture with a 40 μg/mL ozone concentration. Patients in the control arm received supportive care. Assignment to hemotherapy versus usual care was determined based on the admitting physician on the day of admission, with only one of the three possible physicians prescribing ozonated autohemotherapyMain Outcomes The primary outcome was time from hospital admission to clinical improvement, which was defined as either hospital discharge or a two-point improvement in clinical status measured on a six-point ordinal scale. Secondary outcomes were clinical improvement measured on the 7th, 14th and 28th day after admission, as well as time to a 2-fold reduction in concentrations of C-protein reactive, ferritin, D-dimer and lactate dehydrogenase.Results The mean age of the cohort was 68 y and 72% (n=13) were male. Nine patients (50%) received ozonated autohemotherapy beginning on the day of admission. In unadjusted comparisons, ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with significantly shorter time to clinical improvement (median [IQR]), 7 days [6-10] vs 28 days [8-31], p=0.04) and significantly higher proportion of patients achieving 14-day clinical improvement (88.8% vs 33.3%, p=0.01). In risk-adjusted analyses, ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with a shorter mean time to clinical improvement (−11.3 days, p=0.04, 95% CI −22.25 to −0.42).Conclusions and Relevance Ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with a significantly shorter time to clinical improvement in this prospective cohort study. Given the small sample size and singlecenter study design, these observations require evaluation in larger randomized controlled trials.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04370223Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by a multidisciplinary human research ethics committee at the institution.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.