PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sandini, Corrado AU - Zöller, Daniela AU - Schneider, Maude AU - Tarun, Anjali AU - Armando, Marco AU - Nelson, Barnaby AU - Mallawaarachchi, Sumudu Rasangi AU - Amminger, G. Paul AU - Farhall, John AU - Bolt, Luke K. AU - Yuen, Hok Pan AU - Markulev, Connie AU - Schäfer, Miriam R. AU - Mossaheb, Nilufar AU - Schlögelhofer, Monika AU - Smesny, Stefan AU - Hickie, Ian B. AU - Berger, Gregor Emanuel AU - Chen, Eric Y.H. AU - de Haan, Lieuwe AU - Nieman, Dorien H. AU - Nordentoft, Merete AU - Riecher-Rössler, Anita AU - Verma, Swapna AU - Thompson, Andrew AU - Yung, Alison Ruth AU - Allott, Kelly A. AU - McGorry, Patrick D. AU - Van De Ville, Dimitri AU - Eliez, Stephan TI - Characterization and Prediction of Clinical Pathways of Vulnerability to Psychosis through Graph Signal Processing AID - 10.1101/2020.06.11.20128769 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.11.20128769 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.11.20128769.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.11.20128769.full AB - There is a growing recognition that psychiatric symptoms have the potential to causally interact with one another. Particularly in the earliest stages of psychopathology dynamic interactions between symptoms could contribute heterogeneous and cross-diagnostic clinical evolutions. Current clinical approaches attempt to merge clinical manifestations that co-occur across subjects and could therefore significantly hinder our understanding of clinical pathways connecting individual symptoms. Network approaches have the potential to shed light on the complex dynamics of early psychopathology. In the present manuscript we attempt to address 2 main limitations that have in our opinion hindered the application of network approaches in the clinical setting. The first limitation is that network analyses have mostly been applied to cross-sectional data, yielding results that often lack the intuitive interpretability of simpler categorical or dimensional approaches. Here we propose an approach based on multi-layer network analysis that offers an intuitive low-dimensional characterization of longitudinal pathways involved in the evolution of psychopathology, while conserving high-dimensional information on the role of specific symptoms. The second limitation is that network analyses typically characterize symptom connectivity at the level of a population, whereas clinical practice deals with symptom severity at the level of the individual. Here we propose an approach based on graph signal processing that exploits knowledge of network interactions between symptoms to predict longitudinal clinical evolution at the level of the individual. We test our approaches in two independent samples of individuals with genetic and clinical vulnerability for developing psychosis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) (Grant numbers: to SE 324730_121996 and 324730_144260) and by the National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Synapsy-The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases (SNF, Grant number: 51AU40_125759). MarS (#163859) and MauS (#162006) were supported by grants from the SNF. This work was supported by grant 07TGF-1102 from the Stanley Medical Research Institute, grant 566529 from the NHMRC Australia Program (Drs McGorry, Hickie, and Yung, and Amminger), and a grant from the Colonial Foundation. Dr McGorry was supported by Senior Principal Research Fellowship 1060996 from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC); Drs Yung and Amminger were supported by NHMRC Senior Research Fellowships 1080963 and 566593, respectively; and Dr Nelson was supported by NHMRC Career Development Fellowship 1027532.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The he study was approved by the Institutional ReviewBoard of the University of Geneva School of Medicine.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData referred to in the manuscript is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.