RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evidence for causal links between known modifiable risk factors and dementia: A systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.23.24312475
DO 10.1101/2024.08.23.24312475
A1 Desai, Roopal
A1 John, Amber
A1 Anderson, Emma
A1 Stafford, Jean
A1 Marchant, Natalie L.
A1 Charlesworth, Georgina
A1 Zuber, Verena
A1 Stott, Joshua
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/23/2024.08.23.24312475.abstract
AB Background We aimed to systematically review the evidence for causal associations between the known modifiable risk factors and dementia based on Mendelian randomization (MR) studies.Method Five databases were searched from inception to April 2024 investigating the association between the twelve risk factors identified in the Lancet Commission and dementia. Evaluable analyses were categorised into one of four levels (robust, probable, suggestive, insufficient) based on estimate significance level and concordance of direction of effect between main and sensitivity analyses.Results 47 articles were included representing 160 separate analyses (136 unique; 104 evaluable) for ten risk factors and six dementia outcomes. There were no valid analyses for air pollution and traumatic brain injury. Of the unique and evaluable analyses over half (59.3%) were evaluated as providing ‘insufficient’ evidence of causal links. There was no evidence that genetically predicted liability to hearing loss was associated with dementia and limited genetic evidence for social contact. Evidence for education, obesity, depression, alcohol consumption and physical activity was inconclusive. There was probable evidence that smoking was protective against dementia risk however this may be an artefact of survivor bias. The two risk factors with the strongest genetic evidence for links with dementia were diabetes (probable evidence) and blood pressure (probable and suggestive evidence).Conclusion Genetic evidence for eight of the risk factors examined was insufficient or inconclusive. However, the null findings should be interpreted in the light of the biases inherent to MR studies. The strongest genetic evidence supported a causal link between diabetes and dementia.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementN/AAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript