RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Altered neurobehavioral reward response predicts psychotic-like experiences in youth exposed to cannabis prenatally
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.23.24312453
DO 10.1101/2024.08.23.24312453
A1 Amir, Carolyn M.
A1 Ghahremani, Dara G.
A1 Chang, Sarah E.
A1 Cooper, Ziva D.
A1 Bearden, Carrie E.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/23/2024.08.23.24312453.abstract
AB Importance Rates of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) are rising with increasingly permissive legislation regarding cannabis use, which may be a risk factor for psychosis. Disrupted reward-related neural circuitry may underlie this relationship.Objective To elucidate neural mechanisms involved in the association between PCE and youth-onset psychotic-like experiences by probing correlates of reward anticipation, a neurobehavioral marker of endocannabinoid-mediated dopaminergic function.Design, setting, and participants This longitudinal, prospective study analyzed task-related functional neuroimaging data from baseline (n=11,368), 2-year follow-up (n=7,928), and 4-year follow-up (n=2,982) of the ongoing Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, which recruited children aged 9 to 10 years old at baseline from 22 sites across the United States.Results PCE (n=652 exposed youth) is longitudinally associated with psychotic-like experiences. Blunted neural response to reward anticipation is associated with psychotic-like experiences, with stronger effects observed in PCE youth (all |β| > 0.5; false discovery rate [FDR]–corrected P < .05). This hypoactivation at baseline predicts psychosis symptomatology in middle adolescence (4-year follow-up visit; β=-.004; FDR-corrected P < .05). Dampened behavioral reward sensitivity is associated with psychotic-like experiences across baseline, 2-year follow-up visit, and 4-year follow-up visit (|β| = .21; FDR-corrected P < .001). Psychotic-like experiences are positively associated with trait-level measures of reward motivation and impulsivity, with stronger effects for PCE youth (all |β| > 0.1; all FDR-corrected P < .05).Conclusions and Relevance Blunted activation in reward-related brain regions may serve as a biomarker for disrupted reward processing and increased psychosis risk during development. PCE may affect childhood behaviors and traits related to altered reward sensitivity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners via the following awards: U01DA041048, U01DA050989, U01DA051016, U01DA041022, U01DA051018, U01DA051037, U01DA050987, U01DA041174, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041028, U01DA041134, U01DA050988, U01DA051039, U01DA041156, U01DA041025, U01DA041120, U01DA051038, U01DA041148, U01DA041093, U01DA041089, U24DA041123 and U24DA041147. A full list of federal supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. Participating study sites and site principal investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/consortium_members/. This work is also supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant F31DA060068Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a multisite, longitudinal study designed to recruit more than 10,000 children aged 9 to 10 years and follow them over 10 years into early adulthood. The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/consortium_members/.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe study used openly available human data, originally located within the NIMH Data Archive ABCD Collection Release 5.1 (doi: 10.15154/z563-zd24)