RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparative Analysis of Stress Responses in Medical Students Using Virtual Reality Versus Traditional 3D-Printed Mannequins for Pericardiocentesis Training
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.22.24312406
DO 10.1101/2024.08.22.24312406
A1 Rubio-López, Alberto
A1 García Carmona, Rodrigo
A1 Zarandieta Román, Laura
A1 Rubio Navas, Alejandro
A1 González Pinto, Ángel
A1 Cardinal-Fernández, Pablo
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/22/2024.08.22.24312406.abstract
AB Background As medical education evolves, innovative methods like virtual reality (VR) and 3D-printed mannequins are increasingly used to simulate high-stress medical scenarios realistically. This study investigates the effectiveness of VR and 3D-printed mannequins in replicating stress levels during pericardiocentesis training, comparing their impact on the emotional and physiological responses of learners.Methods We enrolled 108 final-year medical students who were randomized to train with both VR and 3D-printed mannequins. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was employed to assess stress responses. Additionally, a secondary analysis examined the influence of demographic factors, lifestyle, medication use, and academic stress on these responses.Results Both VR and traditional mannequin-based training methods proved equally effective in simulating the stress levels encountered in real medical procedures. Our findings indicate significant interactions between stress markers and demographic factors, which highlights the complex nature of stress responses in medical education and underscores the necessity for personalized training approaches.Conclusion The study validates the use of VR as a viable alternative to traditional mannequins, capable of simulating the technical skills and emotional pressures of medical procedures such as pericardiocentesis. Incorporating VR into medical training programs may enhance learning outcomes and accessibility, particularly in settings constrained by resources.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics Committee of HM Monteprincipe University Hospital gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available in publicly available repositories.