RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Ethnicity, comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and their associations with COVID-19 infection in England: a cohort analysis of UK Biobank data
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.06.20092676
DO 10.1101/2020.05.06.20092676
A1 Prats-Uribe, Albert
A1 Paredes, Roger
A1 Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/11/2020.05.06.20092676.abstract
AB Objectives Recent data suggest higher COVID-19 rates and severity in Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) communities. The mechanisms underlying such associations remain unclear. We aimed to study the association between ethnicity and risk of COVID-19 infection and disentangle any correlation with socioeconomic deprivation or previous comorbidity.Design Prospective cohort.Setting UK Biobank linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and COVID-19 tests until 14 April 2020.Participants UK Biobank participants from England, excluding drop-outs and deaths.Main measures COVID-19 infection based on a positive PCR test. Ethnicity was self-reported and classified using Office of National Statistics groups. Socioeconomic status was based on index of multiple deprivation quintiles. Comorbidities were self-reported and completed from HES.Analyses Multivariable Poisson analysis to estimate incidence rate ratios of COVID-19 infection according to ethnicity, adjusted for socioeconomic status, alcohol drinking, smoking, body mass index, age, sex, and comorbidity.Results 415,582 participants were included, with 1,416 tested and 651 positive for COVID-19. The incidence of COVID-19 was 0.61% (95% CI: 0.46%-0.82%) in Black/Black British participants, 0.32% (0.19%-0.56%) in ‘other’ ethnicities, 0.32% (0.23%-0.47%) in Asian/Asian British, 0.30% (0.11%-0.80%) in Chinese, 0.16% (0.06%-0.41%) in mixed, and 0.14% (0.13%-0.15%) in White. Compared with White participants, Black/Black British participants had an adjusted relative risk (RR) of 3.30 (2.39-4.55), Chinese participants 3.00 (1.11-8.06), Asian/Asian British participants 2.04 (1.36-3.07), ‘other’ ethnicities 1.93 (1.08-3.45), and mixed ethnicities 1.07 (0.40-2.86). Socioeconomic status (adjusted RR 1.93 (1.51-2.46) for the most deprived), obesity (adjusted RR 1.04 (1.02-1.05) per kg/m2) and comorbid hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and specific renal diseases were also associated with increased risk of COVID-19.Conclusions COVID-19 rates in the UK are higher in BAME communities, those living in deprived areas, obese patients, and patients with previous comorbidity. Public health strategies are needed to reduce COVID-19 infections among the most susceptible groups.Competing Interest StatementDr Prieto-Alhambra reports grants and other from AMGEN; grants, non-financial support and other from UCB Biopharma; grants from Les Laboratoires Servier, outside the submitted work; and Janssen, on behalf of IMI-funded EHDEN and EMIF consortiums, and Synapse Management Partners have supported training programmes organised by DPA's department and open for external participants. Mr Prats-Uribe reports grants from Fundació;n Alfonso Martin Escudero and the Medical Research Council. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Dr Paredes has received grant support and has participated in advisory meetings from Gilead Sciences, Merck-Sharpe & Dohme and ViiV Healthcare, always for topics not related with the current work.Funding StatementThe research was partially supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). DPA is funded through an NIHR Senior Research Fellowship (Grant number SRF-2018-11-ST2-004). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health. APU is supported by Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero and the Medical Research Council (grant numbers MR/K501256/1, MR/N013468/1)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The National Health Service National Research Ethics Service approved the collection and use of UK Biobank data.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be accessed by application to UK Biobank (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply). UK Biobank was established as a resource to allow scientists to carry out research into a wide range of diseases. The resource is available for researchers to use without preferential or exclusive access and all researchers, academic and commercial, are subject to the same application criteria, approval procedures and follow-up process.