RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Machine Learning to Predict-Then-Optimize Elective Orthopaedic Surgery Scheduling Improves Operating Room Utilization
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.10.24311370
DO 10.1101/2024.08.10.24311370
A1 Lex, Johnathan R.
A1 Mosseri, Jacob
A1 Toor, Jay
A1 Abbas, Aazad
A1 Simone, Michael
A1 Ravi, Bheeshma
A1 Whyne, Cari
A1 Khalil, Elias B.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/11/2024.08.10.24311370.abstract
AB Objective To determine the potential for improving elective surgery scheduling for total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA, respectively) by utilizing a two-stage approach that incorporates machine learning (ML) prediction of the duration of surgery (DOS) with scheduling optimization.Materials and Methods Two ML models (for TKA and THA) were trained to predict DOS using patient factors based on 302,490 and 196,942 examples, respectively, from a large international database. Three optimization formulations based on varying surgeon flexibility were compared: Any: surgeons could operate in any operating room at any time, Split: limitation of two surgeons per operating room per day and MSSP: limit of one surgeon per operating room per day. Two years of daily scheduling simulations were performed for each optimization problem using ML-prediction or mean DOS over a range of schedule parameters. Constraints and resources were based on a high-volume arthroplasty hospital in Canada.Results The Any scheduling formulation performed significantly worse than the Split and MSSP formulations with respect to overtime and underutilization (p<0.001). The latter two problems performed similarly (p>0.05) over most schedule parameters. The ML-prediction schedules outperformed those generated using a mean DOS over all schedule parameters, with overtime reduced on average by 300 to 500 minutes per week. Using a 15-minute schedule granularity with a wait list pool of minimum 1 month generated the best schedules.Conclusion Assuming a full waiting list, optimizing an individual surgeon’s elective operating room time using an ML-assisted predict-then-optimize scheduling system improves overall operating room efficiency, significantly decreasing overtime.Highlights- A new approach for elective surgery scheduling was developed combining machine learning prediction of duration of surgery with integer linear programming optimization.- Models developed on six years of prospective multi-institution data and prediction results were used to generate two years of weekly simulated operating room schedules.- Three optimization models with varying levels of surgeon constraint were compared, and the model that optimized an individual surgeon’s wait list performed the best.- Using this approach reduced overtime by 300-500 minutes per week across five operating rooms.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project received Research Ethics Board approval from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Project ID Number: 4899).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon request and approval from the American College of Surgeons. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/acs-nsqip/