RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Retinograd-AI: An Open-source Automated Fundus Autofluorescence Retinal Image Gradability Assessment for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.08.07.24311607
DO 10.1101/2024.08.07.24311607
A1 Naik, Gunjan
A1 Al-Khuzaei, Saoud
A1 Moghul, Ismail
A1 de Guimaraes, Thales A. C.
A1 Sen, Sagnik
A1 Daich Varela, Malena
A1 Liu, Yichen
A1 Bagga, Pallavi
A1 Fu, Dun Jack
A1 Moosajee, Mariya
A1 Madhusudhan, Savita
A1 Webster, Andrew
A1 De Silva, Samantha
A1 Patel, Praveen J.
A1 Mahroo, Omar
A1 Downes, Susan M
A1 Michaelides, Michel
A1 Balaskas, Konstantinos
A1 Pontikos, Nikolas
A1 Woof, William
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/08/07/2024.08.07.24311607.abstract
AB Purpose To develop an automated system for assessing the quality of Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) images in patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRD).Methods We annotated a dataset of 2445 FAF images from patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies which were assessed by three different expert graders. Graders marked images as either gradable (acceptable quality) or ungradable (poor quality), following a strict grading protocol. This dataset was used to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classification model to predict the gradability label of FAF images.Results Retinograd-AI achieves a performance of 91% accuracy on our held-out dataset of 133 images with an Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic (AUROC) of 0.94, indicating high performance in distinguishing between gradable and ungradable images. Applying Retinograd-AI to our full internal dataset, the highest proportion of gradable images was found in the 30-50 years age group, where 84.3% of images were rated as gradable, while the lowest was in 0-15 year olds, where only 45.2% of images were rated as gradable. 83.4% of images from male patients were rated as gradable, and 90.6% of images from female patients. By genotype, from the 30 most common genetic diagnoses, the highest proportion of gradable images was in patients with disease causing variants in PRPH2 (93.9%), while the lowest was RDH12 (28.6%). Eye2Gene single-image gene classification top-5 accuracy on images rated by Retinograd-AI was 69.2%, while top-5 accuracy on images rated as ungradable was 39.0%. Retinograd-AI is open-sourced, and the source code and network weights are available under an MIT licence on GitHub at https://github.com/Eye2Gene/retinograd-aiConclusions Retinograd-AI is the first open-source AI model for automated retinal image quality assessment of FAF images in IRDs. Automated gradability assessment through Retinograd AI enables large scale analysis of retinal images, which is an essential part of developing good analysis pipelines, and real-time quality assessment, which is essential for deployment of AI algorithms, such as Eye2Gene, into clinical settings. Due to the diverse nature of IRD pathologies, Retinograd-AI may also be applicable to FAF imaging for other conditions, either in its current form or through transfer learning and fine-tuning.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is primarily funded by a NIHR AI Award (AI_AWARD02488) which supported NP, WAW, MM, KB, SD and SM. The research was also supported by a grant from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology. NP was also previously funded by Moorfields Eye Charity Career Development Award (R190031A). OAM is supported by the Wellcome Trust (206619/Z/17/Z). SA is supported by a scholarship from Qatar National Research Fund (GSRA6-1-0329-19010).This project was also supported by a generous donation by Stephen and Elizabeth Archer in memory of Marion Woods. The hardware used for analysis was supported by the BRC Challenge Fund (BRC3_027).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the IRB and the UK Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee (REC) reference (22/WA/0049) "Eye2Gene: accelerating the diagnosis of inherited retinal diseases" Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) (project ID: 242050). All research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.  I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes