PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - He, Hongli AU - Huang, Xiaobo TI - Sivelestat Sodium in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Combined with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome AID - 10.1101/2024.07.28.24311151 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.07.28.24311151 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/29/2024.07.28.24311151.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/29/2024.07.28.24311151.full AB - Objectives Neutrophil elastase (NE) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Sivelestat sodium, an NE inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with ARDS combined with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). This trial was designed to evaluate the role of sivelestat sodium in mild-to-moderate ARDS combined with SIRS.Methods We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolling patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate ARDS combined with SIRS admitted within 72 hours of ARDS onset (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04909697). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to sivelestat or placebo. Trial drugs were administrated as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.2 mg/kg/h for 5 days. The primary outcome was PaO2/FiO2 ratio change on day 3 after randomization, which was defined as (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 – baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio)/baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio.Results The study was stopped early at the recommendation of an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board, which noted a between-group difference in mortality. A total of 162 patients were randomized, of whom 81 were assigned to receive sivelestat sodium and 81 placebo. On day 3, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved by 41% in the sivelestat group compared to 16% in the placebo group (difference, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.40, p=0.001). In addition, the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the sivelestat group compared to the placebo group (median 104.0 hours versus 170.3 hours, p=0.006). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant reduction in 90-day mortality in patients receiving sivelestat compared to those not receiving sivelestat (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.99; p=0.044).Conclusion In patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS combined with SIRS, sivelestat sodium may improve oxygenation on day3, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, and was associated with reduced 90-day mortality.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04909697Funding StatementThis study was funded by Shanghai Huilun (Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which is also responsible for the supply of the study drug andplacebo as well as distribution to the participating centers. Funding agencyhad no input into the design, conduct, data collection, statistical analysis, orwriting of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:(1)Ethics committee of sichuan people's hospital gave ethical approval for this work. (2)Ethics committee of affiliated hospital of chengdu university of traditional chinese medicine gave ethical approval for this work. (3)Ethics committee of chengdu shuangliu district first people's hospital gave ethical approval for this work. (4)Ethics committee of chengdu second people's hospital gave ethical approval for this work. (5)Ethics committee of chengdu fifth people's hospital gave ethical approval for this work. (6)Ethics committee of affiliated hospital of chengdu university gave ethical approval for this work. (7)Ethics committee of chengdu third people's hospital gave ethical approval for this work (8)Ethics committee of sichuan cancer hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. And all data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.