PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Chemaitelly, Hiam AU - Ayoub, Houssein H. AU - Coyle, Peter AU - Tang, Patrick AU - Hasan, Mohammad R. AU - Yassine, Hadi M. AU - Al Thani, Asmaa A. AU - Al-Kanaani, Zaina AU - Al-Kuwari, Einas AU - Jeremijenko, Andrew AU - Kaleeckal, Anvar Hassan AU - Latif, Ali Nizar AU - Shaik, Riyazuddin Mohammad AU - Abdul-Rahim, Hanan F. AU - Nasrallah, Gheyath K. AU - Al-Kuwari, Mohamed Ghaith AU - Al-Romaihi, Hamad Eid AU - Al-Thani, Mohamed H. AU - Al-Khal, Abdullatif AU - Bertollini, Roberto AU - Butt, Adeel A. AU - Abu-Raddad, Laith J. TI - Assessing Healthy Vaccinee Bias in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies: A National Cohort Study in Qatar AID - 10.1101/2024.07.28.24311115 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.07.28.24311115 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/29/2024.07.28.24311115.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/29/2024.07.28.24311115.full AB - Background: This study investigated the presence of the healthy vaccinee bias in two COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies, involving primary series and booster vaccinations, as well as its temporal patterns and variability across different subpopulations, by examining the association between COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality in Qatar.Methods: Two matched, retrospective cohort studies assessed the incidence of non-COVID-19 death in national cohorts of individuals with a primary series vaccination versus no vaccination (two-dose analysis), and individuals with three-dose (booster) vaccination versus primary series vaccination (three-dose analysis), from January 5, 2021, to April 9, 2024.Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-COVID-19 death was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) in the two-dose analysis and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67-1.07) in the three-dose analysis. In the first six months of follow-up in the two-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.46); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19- 1.94). In the first six months of follow-up in the three-dose analysis, the aHR was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50); however, the combined analysis of all subsequent periods showed an aHR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85). The overall effectiveness of the primary series and third-dose vaccinations against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 was 95.9% (95% CI: 94.0-97.1) and 34.1% (95% CI:-46.4-76.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the healthy vaccinee bias is pronounced among those aged 50 years and older and among those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19.Conclusion: A strong healthy vaccinee bias was observed in the first six months following vaccination. This bias may have stemmed from a lower likelihood of vaccination among seriously ill, end-of-life individuals, and less mobile elderly populations. Despite this bias, vaccination provided strong protection against severe COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementDr. Butt has received institutional grant funding from Gilead Sciences unrelated to the work presented in this paper. Otherwise, we declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThe authors are grateful for institutional salary support from the Biomedical Research Program and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, both at Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, as well as for institutional salary support provided by the Ministry of Public Health, Hamad Medical Corporation, and Sidra Medicine. The authors are also grateful for the Qatar Genome Programme and Qatar University Biomedical Research Center for institutional support for the reagents needed for the viral genome sequencing. Statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review boards at Hamad Medical Corporation and Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar approved this retrospective study with a waiver of informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe dataset of this study is a property of the Qatar Ministry of Public Health that was provided to the researchers through a restricted-access agreement that prevents sharing the dataset with a third party or publicly. The data are available under restricted access for preservation of confidentiality of patient data. Access can be obtained through a direct application for data access to Her Excellency the Minister of Public Health (https://www.moph.gov.qa/english/OurServices/eservices/Pages/Governmental-HealthCommunication-Center.aspx). The raw data are protected and are not available due to data privacy laws. Aggregate data are available within the paper and its supplementary information.