RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Population Performance and Individual Agreement of Coronary Artery Disease Polygenic Risk Scores
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.25.24310931
DO 10.1101/2024.07.25.24310931
A1 Abramowitz, Sarah A.
A1 Boulier, Kristin
A1 Keat, Karl
A1 Cardone, Katie M.
A1 Shivakumar, Manu
A1 DePaolo, John
A1 Judy, Renae
A1 Kim, Dokyoon
A1 Rader, Daniel J.
A1 Ritchie,
A1 Voight, Benjamin F.
A1 Pasaniuc, Bogdan
A1 Levin, Michael G.
A1 Damrauer, Scott M.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/29/2024.07.25.24310931.abstract
AB Importance Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for coronary artery disease (CAD) are a growing clinical and commercial reality. Whether existing scores provide similar individual-level assessments of disease liability is a critical consideration for clinical implementation that remains uncharacterized.Objective Characterize the reliability of CAD PRSs that perform equivalently at the population level at predicting individual-level risk.Design Cross-sectional Study.Setting All of Us Research Program (AOU), Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB), and UCLA ATLAS Precision Health Biobank.Participants Volunteers of diverse genetic backgrounds enrolled in AOU, PMBB, and UCLA with available electronic health record and genotyping data.Exposures Polygenic risk for CAD from previously published PRSs and new PRSs developed separately from the testing cohorts.Main Outcomes and Measures Sets of CAD PRSs that perform population prediction equivalently were identified by comparing calibration and discrimination (Brier score and AUROC) of generalized linear models of prevalent CAD using Bayesian analysis of variance. Among equivalently performing scores, individual-level agreement between risk estimates was tested with intraclass correlation (ICC) and Light’s Kappa, measures of inter-rater reliability.Results 50 PRSs were calculated for 171,095 AOU participants. When included in a model of prevalent CAD, 48 scores had practically equivalent Brier scores and AUROCs (region of practical equivalence = 0.02). Across these scores, 84% of participants had at least one score in both the top and bottom risk quintile. Continuous agreement of individual risk predictions from the 48 scores was poor, with an ICC of 0.351 (95% CI; 0.349, 0.352). Agreement between two statistically equivalent scores was moderate, with an ICC of 0.649 (95% CI; 0.646, 0.652). Light’s Kappa, used to evaluate consistency of assignment to high-risk thresholds, did not exceed 0.56 (interpreted as ‘fair’) across statistically and practically equivalent scores. Repeating the analysis among 41,193 PMBB and 50,748 UCLA participants yielded different sets of statistically and practically equivalent scores which also lacked strong individual agreement.Conclusions and Relevance Across three diverse biobanks, CAD PRSs that performed equivalently at the population level produced unreliable individual risk estimates. Approaches to clinical implementation of CAD PRSs must consider the potential for discordant individual risk estimates from otherwise indistinguishable scores.Competing Interest StatementMGL has received research funding to the institution from Myome to study a CAD PRS, unrelated to this work. SMD received research support from RenalytixAI and Novo Nordisk, outside the scope of the current research, and is named as a coinventor on a Government-owned US Patent application related to the use of genetic risk prediction for venous thromboembolic disease and for the use of PDE3B inhibition for preventing cardiovascular disease, both filed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs in accordance with Federal regulatory requirements.Funding StatementS.A.A. is supported by the Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation. K.B. is funded by a NIH T32 grant. B.F.V. is grateful for support for the work from the NIH/NIDDK (DK126194). M.G.L. received support from the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, the NIH/NHLBI National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellowship (T32HL007843), the Measey Foundation, and Doris Duke Foundation (Award 2023-0224). He has received research funding to the institution for a CAD PRS clinical trial from Myome, unrelated to this work. S.M.D. was supported by the US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Research and Development Award IK2-CX001780. This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. S.M.D. received research support from RenalytixAI and Novo Nordisk, outside the scope of the current research, and is named as a coinventor on a Government-owned US Patent application related to the use of genetic risk prediction for venous thromboembolic disease and for the use of PDE3B inhibition for preventing cardiovascular disease, both filed by the US Department of Veterans Affairs in accordance with Federal regulatory requirements.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Penn Medicine BioBank is approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Patient Recruitment and Sample Collection for Precision Health Activities at UCLA is an approved study by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (UCLA IRB) IRB#17-001013.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesUpon publication, the two original polygenic risk scores for CAD will be deposited on the Polygenic Score Catalog. R code for a generalizable score comparison pipeline will be available at https://github.com/Sabramow/PRS_Var. Summary statistics from the genome-wide association study meta-analysis will be available upon request.