RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Individualized melanoma risk prediction using machine learning with electronic health records
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.26.24311080
DO 10.1101/2024.07.26.24311080
A1 Wan, Guihong
A1 Khattab, Sara
A1 Roster, Katie
A1 Nguyen, Nga
A1 Yan, Boshen
A1 Rashdan, Hannah
A1 Estiri, Hossein
A1 Semenov, Yevgeniy R.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/27/2024.07.26.24311080.abstract
AB Background Melanoma is a lethal form of skin cancer with a high propensity for metastasizing, making early detection crucial. This study aims to develop a machine learning model using electronic health record data to identify patients at high risk of developing melanoma to prioritize them for dermatology screening.Methods This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with melanoma (cases), as well as matched patients without melanoma (controls), from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), and other hospital centers within the Research Patient Data Registry at Mass General Brigham healthcare system between 1992 and 2022. Patient demographics, family history, diagnoses, medications, procedures, laboratory tests, reasons for visits, and allergy data six months prior to the date of first melanoma diagnosis or date of censoring were extracted. A machine learning framework for health outcomes (MLHO) was utilized to build the model. Performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation of the MGH cohort (internal validation) and by using the MGH cohort for model training and the non-MGH cohort for independent testing (external validation). The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) and the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR), along with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), were computed.Results This study identified 10,778 patients with melanoma and 10,778 matched patients without melanoma, including 8,944 from MGH and 1,834 from non-MGH hospitals in each cohort, both with an average follow-up duration of 9 years. In the internal and external validations, the model achieved AUC-ROC values of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.819–0.832) and 0.823 (95% CI: 0.809–0.837) and AUC-PR scores of 0.841 (95% CI: 0.834–0.848) and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.806–0.839), respectively. Important risk features included a family history of melanoma, a family history of skin cancer, and a prior diagnosis of benign neoplasm of skin. Conversely, medical examination without abnormal findings was identified as a protective feature.Conclusions Machine learning techniques and electronic health records can be effectively used to predict melanoma risk, potentially aiding in identifying high-risk patients and enabling individualized screening strategies for melanoma.Competing Interest StatementYRS is an advisory board member or consultant and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Incyte Corporation, Sanofi, Galderma, Castle Biosciences, and Iovance Biotherapeutics.Funding Statementthe Melanoma Research Alliance Dermatology Fellowship award: https://doi.org/10.48050/pc.gr.157226.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of Mass General Brigham gave ethical approval for this work (Protocol #2020P002113).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll summary data supporting the findings of this study available within the article or its supplementary materials. The patient data generated for this study can only be shared per specific institutional review board requirements. Upon request to the corresponding author, a data sharing agreement can be initiated following institution-specific guidelines.