RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.26.24311051
DO 10.1101/2024.07.26.24311051
A1 Fang, Jialu
A1 Wang, Wenliang
A1 Yin, Guosheng
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/27/2024.07.26.24311051.abstract
AB The calibration-free odds type (CFO-type) of designs, as data-driven decision-making Bayesian approaches, leverage historical cumulative data across various dose levels, primarily aiming at identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Inheriting the ideas from game theory or “tug-of-war”, CFO mimics the games of force: one pushes the dose down while the other pushes it up. Extensive simulations validate that CFO-type designs maintain an optimal balance between efficiency and safety in MTD identification, with performance metrics that are comparable to, or occasionally surpass the state-of-the-art methods. This article primarily introduces the R package CFO for implementing and assessing CFO-type designs in phase I clinical trials. Besides, we propose integrating the mechanism of exploration and exploitation from reinforcement learning into the CFO design, leading to a novel approach: the randomized CFO (rCFO) design. The CFO package encompasses various variants tailored to accommodate different scenarios. Beyond the fundamental CFO design, these include the two-dimensional CFO (2dCFO) designed for drug-combination trials, accumulative CFO (aCFO) for accruing all dose information, time-to-event CFO (TITE-CFO), and fractional CFO (fCFO) which are developed to specifically address late-onset toxicity. Moreover, hybrid designs such as TITE-aCFO and f-aCFO, which integrate both late-onset toxicity and all dose information for decision making, are also included. CFO provides a robust set of functions used for determining subsequent cohort doses, selecting the MTD, and conducting simulations to evaluate design operating characteristics. The properties and results are presented to trial investigators through simple textual and graphical outputs. The user-friendly interface, adaptability to various design considerations, and the comprehensive implementation of CFO-type designs position CFO as a noteworthy tool for phase I clinical trials.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript