PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Li, Edmond
AU  - Lounsbury, Olivia
AU  - Hasnain, Mujtaba
AU  - Ashrafian, Hutan
AU  - Darzi, Ara
AU  - Neves, Ana Luisa
AU  - Clarke, Jonathan
TI  - Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study
AID  - 10.1101/2024.07.25.24311018
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.07.25.24311018
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/26/2024.07.25.24311018.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/26/2024.07.25.24311018.full
AB  - Background The lack of interoperability has been a well-recognised limitation associated with the use of electronic health records (EHR). However, less is known about how it manifests for frontline NHS staff when delivering care, how it impacts patient care, and what are its implications on care efficiency.Objectives (1) To capture the perceptions of physicians regarding the current state of EHRs interoperability, (2) to investigate how poor interoperability affects patient care and safety and (3) to determine the effects on care efficiency in the NHS.Methods An online survey was conducted to explore how physicians perceived the routine use of EHRs, its effects on patient safety, and impact to care efficiency in NHS healthcare facilities. Descriptive statistics was used to report any notable findings observed.Results A total of 636 NHS physicians participated. Participants reported that EHR interoperability is rudimentary across much of the NHS, with limited ability to read but not edit data from within their organisation. Negative perceptions were most pronounced amongst specialties in secondary care settings and those with less than one year of EHR experience or lower self-reported EHR skills. Limited interoperability prolonged hospital stays, lengthened consultation times, and frequently necessitated repeat investigations to be performed. Limited EHR interoperability impaired physician access to clinical data, hampered communication between providers, and was perceived to threatened patient safety.Conclusion As healthcare data continues to increase in complexity and volume, EHR interoperability must evolve to accommodate these growing changes and ensure the continued delivery of safe care. The experiences of physicians provide valuable insight into the practical challenges limited interoperability poses and can contribute to future policy solutions to better integrate EHRs in the clinical environment.Public Interest/Lay Summary Limited interoperability between EHR systems has been a longstanding problem since the technology’s introduction in NHS England. However, little research has been done to understand the extent of this problem from the perspective of physicians and the challenges it poses.This study surveyed 636 physicians across England to better understand limited EHR interoperability. Most participants reported that interoperability between NHS facilities was inadequate. Consequences of this included increased duration of hospital stays, lengthened consultation times, and more redundant diagnostic tests performed. Limited interoperability hindered communication between NHS workers and threatened care quality and patient safety. As more healthcare technologies are incorporated into the NHS, gaining greater insight from physicians is critical to finding solutions to address these problems.Competing Interest StatementHA is chief scientific officer of Pre-emptive Health and Medicine at Flagship Pioneering. AD is executive chair of Pre-emptive Health and Medicine at Flagship Pioneering.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Imperial College National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC) (Reference no. PSTRC-2016-004). AD and ALN are supported by the NIHR North West London Patient Safety Research Collaboration (NIHR NWL PSRC), with infrastructure support from Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. ALN is also supported by the NIHR North West London Applied Research Collaboration (NIHR NWL ARC). The funders and sponsors have had no role in development and drafting of this manuscript. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Overall ethical approval for this project was granted by the Imperial College Research Ethics Committee (ICREC) (Reference no. 20IC5906). This is a dedicated ethics oversight body at Imperial College London for all health-related research involving human participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.APIapplication programming interfaceCMSUS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCPOEcomputerised provider/physician order entryEHRelectronic health recordsFHIRFast Healthcare Interoperability ResourcesGPgeneral practitionerHIThealth information technologyHL7Health Level 7NHSNational Health ServiceSHOsenior house officerPLOSpatient length of stay