PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Au Yeung, SL
AU  - Borges, MC
AU  - Lawlor, DA
AU  - Schooling, CM
TI  - The impact of lung function on cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular risk factors: a two sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization study
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.01.20118919
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.01.20118919
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.06.01.20118919.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.06.01.20118919.full
AB  - Background Observational studies suggested lung function is inversely associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) although these studies could be susceptible to residual confounding. We conducted a 2 sample Mendelian randomization study using summary statistics from genome wide association studies (GWAS) to clarify the role of lung function in CVD and its risk factors, and conversely the role of CVD in lung function.Methods We obtained genetic instruments for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from publicly available UK Biobank summary statistics (n = 421,986). We applied these genetic instruments for FEV1 (260) and FVC (320) to publicly available GWAS summary statistics for coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 184,305), stroke and its subtypes (n = 446,696), atrial fibrillation (n = 1,030,836), and heart failure (n = 977,320) and cardiovascular risk factors. Inverse variance weighting was used to assess the impact of lung function on these outcomes. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger, weighted median, MR-PRESSO, and multivariable Mendelian randomization. We also conducted bi-directional Mendelian randomization to assess whether CVD affects lung function.Results FEV1 and FVC were inversely associated with CAD (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) increase, 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.82) and 0.70 (95%CI 0.62 to 0.78)), overall stroke (0.87 (95%CI 0.77 to 0.97), 0.90 (0.82 to 1.00)), ischemic stroke (0.87 (95%CI 0.77 to 0.99), 0.90 (95%CI 0.80 to 1.00)), small vessel stroke (0.78, (95%CI 0.61 to 1.00), 0.74 (95%CI 0.61 to 0.92)), and large artery stroke (0.69 (95%CI 0.54 to 0.89), 0.72 (95%CI 0.57 to 0.91)). FEV1 and FVC were inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (0.75 (95%CI 0.62 to 0.90), 0.67 (95%CI 0.58 to 0.79)) and systolic blood pressure. Sensitivity analyses produced similar direction for most outcomes although the magnitude sometimes differed. Adjusting for height attenuated results for CAD (e.g. OR for 1SD FEV1 0.95 (0.76 to 1.20), but this may reflect weak instrument bias. This adjustment did not attenuate effects for stroke or type 2 diabetes. No strong evidence was observed for CVD affecting lung function.Conclusion Higher lung function likely protect against CAD and stroke.Competing Interest StatementDAL receives support from several national and international government and charitable research funders, as well as from Medtronic Ltd and Roche Diagnostics for research unrelated to that presented here. All other authors declare they have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.Funding StatementSLAY was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund Research Fellowship Scheme (#01150037). MCB is supported by MRC Skills Development Fellowship (MR/P014054/1). MCB and DAL contribution to this study is supported by the British Heart Foundation (AA/18/7/34219) and MCB and DAL work in a Unit receives funding from the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MRC) (MC_UU_00011/6). The funders had no role in the design, analyses, interpretation of results or writing of the paper. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily any of the funders.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In this study we have used publicly-available GWAS results from relevant publications and database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). No individual participant data were collected or used. Details of ethical approval and participant consent for each of the studies that contributed to the GWAS can be found in the original publications.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in this study are publicly available and can be accessed via the references and links presented in the manuscript.