PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Volpatto, Diego T.
AU  - Resende, Anna Claudia M.
AU  - dos Anjos, Lucas
AU  - Silva, João V. O.
AU  - Dias, Claudia M.
AU  - Almeida, Regina C.
AU  - Malta, Sandra M. C.
TI  - Spreading of COVID-19 in Brazil: Impacts and uncertainties in social distancing strategies
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.30.20117283
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.30.20117283
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.05.30.20117283.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.05.30.20117283.full
AB  - Brazil’s continental dimension poses a challenge to the control of the spread of COVID-19. Due to the country specific scenario of high social and demographic heterogeneity, combined with limited testing capacity, lack of reliable data, under-reporting of cases, and restricted testing policy, the focus of this study is twofold: (i) to develop a generalized SEIRD model that implicitly takes into account the quarantine measures, and (ii) to estimate the response of the COVID-19 spread dynamics to perturbations/uncertainties. By investigating the projections of cumulative numbers of confirmed and death cases, as well as the effective reproduction number, we show that the model parameter related to social distancing measures is one of the most influential along all stages of the disease spread and the most influential after the infection peak. Due to such importance in the outcomes, different relaxation strategies of social distancing measures are investigated in order to determine which strategies are viable and less hazardous to the population. The results highlight the need of keeping social distancing policies to control the disease spread. Specifically, the considered scenario of abrupt social distancing relaxation implemented after the occurrence of the peak of positively diagnosed cases can prolong the epidemic, with a significant increase of the projected numbers of confirmed and death cases. An even worse scenario could occur if the quarantine relaxation policy is implemented before evidence of the epidemiological control, indicating the importance of the proper choice of when to start relaxing social distancing measures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementACMR, LA, and JVOS would like to thank the support through CNPq projects 132591/2014-6, 301327/2020-3, and 166171/2018-2. This study was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Finance Code 001.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Do not apply.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll related code and data are available at Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/3865730