RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Systematic Review of Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance Points to Lower Diagnostic Sensitivity for Common Mutations and Increased Incidence of Uncommon Mutations in Clinical Strains of <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em>
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.30.20118075
DO 10.1101/2020.05.30.20118075
A1 Valafar, Siavash J.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.05.30.20118075.abstract
AB Molecular testing is rapidly becoming integral to the global tuberculosis (TB) control effort. Uncommon mechanisms of resistance can escape detection by these platforms and lead to the development of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) strains. This article is a systematic review of published articles that reported isoniazid (INH) resistance-conferring mutations between September-2013 and December-2019. The aims were to catalogue mutations associated with INH resistance, estimate their global prevalence and co-occurrence, and their utility in molecular diagnostics. The genes commonly associated with INH resistance, katG, inhA, fabG1, and the intergenic region oxyR’-ahpC were considered in this review. In total, 52 articles were included describing 5,632 INHR clinical isolates from 31 countries. The three most frequently mutated loci continue to be katG315 (4,100), inhA-15 (786), and inhA-8 (105). However, the diagnostic value of inhA-8 is far lower than previously thought, only appearing in 25 (0.4%) INHR isolates that lacked a mutation at the first two loci. Importantly, of the four katG loci recommended by the previous systematic review for diagnostics, only katG315 was observed in our INHR isolates. This indicates continued evolution and regional differences in INH resistance. We have identified 58 loci (common to both systematic reviews) in three genomic regions as a reliable basis for molecular diagnostics. We also catalogue mutations at 49 new loci associated with INH resistance. Including all observed mutations provides a cumulative sensitivity of 85.1%. The most disconcerting is the remaining 14.9% of isolates that harbor an unknown mechanism of resistance, will escape molecular detection, and likely convert to MDR-TB, further complicating treatment. Integrating the information cataloged in this and other similar studies into current diagnostic tools is essential for combating the emergence of MDR-TB. Exclusion of this information will lead to an “unnatural” selection which will result in eradication of the common but propagation of the uncommon mechanisms of resistance, leading to ineffective global published articles that reported isoniazid (INH) resistance-conferring mutations between describing 5,632 INHR clinical isolates from 31 countries. The three most frequently mutated treatment policy and a need for region-specific regiments. Finally, the observance of many low-frequency resistance-conferring mutations point to an advantage of platforms that consider regions rather than specific loci for detection of resistance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB is required as no human data is included.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll available data is included in the manuscript. No external link is required.