RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Telerehabilitation services have declined post-COVID-19
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.22.24310787
DO 10.1101/2024.07.22.24310787
A1 May, Anthony K
A1 Holland, Anne E
A1 Alison, Jennifer A
A1 Herrmann, Kelcie
A1 Cox, Narelle S
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/24/2024.07.22.24310787.abstract
AB Objective To characterize Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) service delivery, investigate the impact of the pandemic on PR services, and describe centre-based PR (CBPR) and telerehabilitation with reference to PR essential components.Design Online national cross-sectional survey.Setting Australian PR services.Participants Representatives of PR programs listed within the Lung Foundation Australia national database (n=295).Interventions Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure(s) Availability of PR in CBPR and telerehabilitation settings.Results 97% of Australian PR services (n=114/117) delivered CBPR, similarly to pre-COVID-19 pandemic availability (96%). 43% (n=50/116) of services delivered telerehabilitation, which was significantly less than availability during COVID-19 restrictions (74%; p<0.001). CBPR was primarily delivered in a group setting (99%; median (IQR) 7 (6-8) participants/group), and telerehabilitation primarily via individual telephone calls (94%). 39% of respondents report CBPR group size has reduced. PR essential components of initial centre-based assessments and individually prescribed/progressed endurance and resistance training were achieved by most CBPR and telerehabilitation programs. Staff training in delivery of telerehabilitation models was undertaken in 33% of services.Conclusions PR essential components are generally met in current Australian programs. However, telerehabilitation services and CBPR program capacity have declined indicating reduced program capacity. Sustainability of effective PR programs is required to support access for people with chronic respiratory diseases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this research. NSC and AEH receive research fellowship support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (GNT2016286 and GNT1197007, respectively).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee approved this research.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsCBPRCentre-based pulmonary rehabilitationIQRInterquartile rangePRPulmonary rehabilitation