PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Popovich, Ivor TI - Microvascular dysfunction induces a hyperdynamic circulation; a mathematical exploration AID - 10.1101/2024.07.22.24310841 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.07.22.24310841 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/23/2024.07.22.24310841.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/23/2024.07.22.24310841.full AB - Background The discordance between the macrocirculation and microcirculation in septic shock has been recognised but never explained. I present a novel mathematical hypothesis as to how heterogenous microcirculatory flow distribution directly induces a hyperdynamic circulation and how elevated central venous pressure induces microcirculatory dysfunction.Methods I explore the tube law and modified Poiseuille resistance for compliant blood vessels. Using these equations a new equation is developed incorporating time constants, elastance of the vessel, unstressed volume and wave reflections that demonstrates the relationship between volume of a microcirculatory vessel and total flow through it.Results The relationship is demonstrated to be constant at zero until the unstressed volume is reached after which it increases exponentially. By considering n of these vessels in parallel, I demonstrate that the summed flow is minimised when flow is equally distributed among the n vessels, while it is maximised when all flow goes through one vessel alone, thereby demonstrating that heterogenous microvascular perfusion leads to increased total flow. It is shown that if conditions of wave reflection are right then a hyperdynamic circulation with high cardiac output develops. It is also demonstrated that high central venous pressure increases wave reflections and necessarily leads to microvascular perfusion heterogeneity if cardiac output is to be maintained.Conclusions Microvascular impairment in septic shock directly leads to a hyperdynamic circulation with high cardiac output. High central venous pressures impair the microcirculation. Decades of clinical findings can now be explained mathematically. Implications for hemodynamic therapy for septic shock are discussed.Clinical Perspective Research in septic shock has focussed on two main components of the circulation; the macrocirculation and microcirculation. Very discordant findings have been observed between the two, to the point that the term ‘uncoupling’ has appeared in the literature in reference to these two circulations. Thus far nobody has put forward a satisfactory physiological explanation as to the mechanism of this discordance. There is a need to understand the physiological mechanisms to guide future attempts and research into methods of resuscitating the septic patient in order to improve circulatory function.This work provides the first theoretical mathematical groundwork as to not only how these circulations are linked, but how they directly influence one another. This sets the framework for future clinical and basic science research and helps us understand how our current resuscitation strategies may work to restore the microcirculation, and when they may start to impair it.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:theoretical mathematical work, ethics not applicableI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll data available on request