PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Eugen-Olsen, Jesper
AU  - Altintas, Izzet
AU  - Tingleff, Jens
AU  - Stauning, Marius
AU  - Gamst-Jensen, Hejdi
AU  - Lindstrøm, Mette B
AU  - Rasmussen, Line Jee Hartmann
AU  - Kristiansen, Klaus Tjelle
AU  - Rasmussen, Christian
AU  - Nehlin, Jan O
AU  - Kallemose, Thomas
AU  - Andersen, Ove
TI  - Low levels of the prognostic biomarker suPAR are predictive of mild outcome in patients with symptoms of COVID-19 - a prospective cohort study
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.27.20114678
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.27.20114678
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.05.27.20114678.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.05.27.20114678.full
AB  - OBJECTIVE To examine if baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can predict whether patients with COVID-19 symptoms will need mechanical ventilation during a 14-day follow-up. Furthermore, to examine differences in demographics, clinical signs, and biomarkers in patients tested either positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2.DESIGN Prospective cohort study including patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19.SETTING Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.PARTICIPANTS 407 patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19 were included from the Emergency Department (ED). Patients were included from March 19 to April 3 and follow-up data was collected until April 17, 2020.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were respiratory failure in patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19 and in those with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test, respectively. Furthermore, we analysed differences between patients testing positive and negative for SARS-CoV-2, and disease severity outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients according to baseline suPAR.BACKGROUND Patients admitted to ED with clinical signs or symptoms of COVID-19 infection need a safe and quick triage, in order to determine if an in-hospital stay is necessary or if the patient can safely be isolated in their own home with relevant precautions. suPAR is a biomarker previously shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in acute medical patients. We aimed to examine if suPAR at baseline presentation is predictive of respiratory failure in patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19. Furthermore, we examined demographic, clinical, and biochemical differences between SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients.RESULTS Among the 407 symptomatic patients, the median (interquartile range) age was 64 years (47-77), 58% were women, and median suPAR was 4.2 ng/ml (2.7-6.4). suPAR level below 4.75 ng/ml at admission ruled out respiratory failure during follow-up with an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.89 (0.85-0.94) and a negative predictive value of 99.5%. Of the 407 symptomatic patients, 117 (28.8%) had a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and presented with significant differences in vital signs, cell counts, and biomarkers compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. In SARS-CoV-2 positive patients eligible for mechanical ventilation (N=87), 26 (30%) developed respiratory failure. Best baseline predictors of respiratory failure were suPAR with an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.88 (0.80-0.95), EWS 0.84 (0.75-0.93), lactate dehydrogenase 0.82 (0.71-0.93), and C-reactive protein 0.80 (0.70-0.89).CONCLUSION SARS-CoV-2 affects several patient parameters underpinning the severe impact of the infection. A low suPAR level (<4.75 ng/ml) at baseline is a useful biomarker for aiding clinical decisions including discharge of patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementJesper Eugen-Olsen is a cofounder, shareholder and CSO of ViroGates, Denmark. Jesper Eugen-Olsen and Ove Andersen is named inventors on patents owned by Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre and licenced to ViroGates.Clinical TrialThis was a prespective study not registeed on clinicaltrials.gov since only registries were usedFunding StatementLJHR was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship through grant R288-2018-380 from the Lundbeck Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (record no. P-2020-513) and the Danish Patient Safety Authority (record no: 31-1521-319). There was no need of approval from the National Committee on Health Research Ethics since only registries were used.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUpon reasonable request, and following regulatory approval, data may be shared.