PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Ng, Fiona FJ
AU  - Verma, Rashmi
AU  - Sani, Levana
AU  - Irwanto, Astrid
AU  - Lee, Michael
AU  - Wee, Angeline
AU  - Chng, Shih Kiat
AU  - Wong, Melvyn
AU  - Chan, Alexandre
TI  - Implementation of Pre-emptive Pharmacogenomics Testing in Outpatient Clinics in Asia (IMPT study)
AID  - 10.1101/2024.07.19.24310681
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.07.19.24310681
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/19/2024.07.19.24310681.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/19/2024.07.19.24310681.full
AB  - Background In view of the limited data related to preemptive pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing in the primary care setting, we designed a study to assess the feasibility of implementing preemptive PGx services at outpatient clinics, with the aim to assess the practicality and challenges of implementing preemptive PGx testing within primary care, and its impact on clinical workflows and patient care.Methods This prospective study was conducted between October 2022 and August 2023 at five outpatient clinics located in Singapore. Patients aged 21 to 65 with a reported history or risk of developing any of the target chronic conditions or any patients receiving one of the 29 PGx-associated medications were recruited. Patients’ buccal samples were processed using the Nala RxReady™, a multi-gene qPCR-based panel of 21 allele variants of five pharmacogenes. Surveys were administered to study participants and clinicians to assess their perceptions and outcomes related to PGx testing.Results Among the 222 patients, 95% had at least one clinically actionable variant. Of these patients, 113 reported taking at least one of the 29 studied drugs, with 21.2% of them receiving at least one clinically actionable recommendation based on their PGx results. A total of 150 patients (67.6%) participated in the post-test follow-up survey. Among them, 70% expressed feeling relieved and happy upon receiving their test reports and reported increased confidence in taking their prescribed medication. Furthermore, clinicians identified the necessity for clearer legal regulations regarding PGx testing and insurance coverage to enhance future adoption of PGx testing.Conclusions Given a high prevalence of clinically actionable variants in almost all tested patients, this study underscores the feasibility and clinical benefits of preemptive PGx testing in primary care clinics.Clinical Trial Registration: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05504135, with the registration date of August 17, 2022.Competing Interest StatementNalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore, is the provider of the multi-gene panel testing conducted for this study. Author FN, RV, AI and LS were employed by NalaGenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore. Author AC is a scientific advisor for Nalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore. AI and LS have financial holdings in Nalagenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore.Clinical TrialNCT05504135Funding StatementThis study is fully funded by NalaGenetics Pte Ltd, Singapore.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by Raffles Hospital Institutional Review Board under reference number 2017/007.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.ADEAdverse Drug EventCDSClinical Decision SupportCPICClinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation ConsortiumCPNDSCanadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug SafetyCYPCytochrome P450DPWGDutch Pharmacogenomics Working GroupEMAEuropean Medicines AgencyEMRElectronic Medical RecordFDAFood and Drug AdministrationHLAHuman Leukocyte AntigensPharmGKBPharmacogenomics KnowledgeBasePGxPharmacogenomicsPMDAPharmaceuticals and Medical Devices AgencyqPCRQualitative Polymerase Chain ReactionRMGRaffles Medical GroupTATTurnaround Time