RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Survey on Optimization and Machine Learning-Based Fair Decision Making in Healthcare
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.16.24304403
DO 10.1101/2024.03.16.24304403
A1 Chen, Zequn
A1 Marrero, Wesley J.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/18/2024.03.16.24304403.abstract
AB The unintended biases introduced by optimization and machine learning (ML) models are a topic of great interest to medical professionals. Bias in healthcare decisions can cause patients from vulnerable populations (e.g., racially minoritized, low-income, or living in rural areas) to have lower access to resources and inferior outcomes, thus exacerbating societal unfairness. In this systematic literature review, we present a structured overview of the literature regarding fair decision making in healthcare until April 2024. After screening 782 unique references, we identified 103 articles within the scope of our review. We categorize the identified articles into the following three sections: algorithmic bias, fairness metrics, and bias mitigation techniques. Specifically, we identify examples of algorithmic, data, and publication bias as they are typically encountered in research and practice. Subsequently, we define and discuss the fairness metrics previously considered in the literature, including notions of fairness through unawareness, demographic parity, equal opportunity, and equal odds. Lastly, we summarize the bias mitigation techniques available in the optimization and ML literature by classifying them into pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing approaches. Fairness in decision making is an emerging field, poised to substantially reduce social inequities and improve the overall well-being of underrepresented groups. Our review aims to increase awareness of fairness in healthcare decision making and facilitate the selection of appropriate approaches under varying scenarios.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/