RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The neonatal gut microbiota: a role in the encephalopathy of prematurity
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.09.12.23295409
DO 10.1101/2023.09.12.23295409
A1 Vaher, Kadi
A1 Blesa Cabez, Manuel
A1 Parga, Paula Lusarreta
A1 Binkowska, Justyna
A1 van Beveren, Gina J
A1 Odendaal, Mari-Lee
A1 Sullivan, Gemma
A1 Stoye, David Q
A1 Corrigan, Amy
A1 Quigley, Alan J
A1 Thrippleton, Michael J
A1 Bastin, Mark E
A1 Bogaert, Debby
A1 Boardman, James P
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/16/2023.09.12.23295409.abstract
AB Preterm birth associates with atypical brain development and neurocognitive impairment. The gut microbiome is implicated in neurobehavioural outcomes of typically developing infants and children, but its relationship with neurodevelopment in preterm infants is unknown. We characterised the faecal microbiome in a cohort of 147 neonates enriched for very preterm birth (<32 weeks’ gestation) using 16S-based and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Delivery mode had the strongest association with preterm microbiome shortly after birth; low birth gestational age, infant sex and antibiotics significantly associated with microbiome composition at NICU discharge. Thereafter, we integrated these data with term-equivalent structural and diffusion brain MRI. Bacterial community composition associated with MRI features of encephalopathy of prematurity. Particularly, abundances of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. correlated with microstructural parameters in deep and cortical grey matter. Metagenome functional capacity analyses suggested that these bacteria may interact with brain microstructural development via tryptophan and propionate metabolism. This study indicates that gut microbiome associates with brain development following preterm birth.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Theirworld (www.theirworld.org) and was carried out in the Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, which was funded by Medical Research Council Centre Grant (MRC G1002033). Participants were scanned in the University of Edinburgh Imaging Research MRI Facility at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, which was established with funding from The Wellcome Trust, Dunhill Medical Trust, Edinburgh and Lothians Research Foundation, Theirworld, The Muir Maxwell Trust and other sources. KV was funded by the Wellcome Translational Neuroscience PhD Programme at the University of Edinburgh (108890/Z/15/Z). MJT was funded by the NHS Lothian Research and Development Office.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval was obtained from the UK National Research Ethics Service (South East Scotland Research Ethic Committee 16/SS/0154). Parents provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll raw 16S and shotgun data and their derivates used for analysis alongside with participant clinical data, sample metadata, and neuroimaging data derivates used in this work are deposited in Edinburgh DataVault (https://doi.org/10.7488/e65499db-2263-4d3c-9335-55ae6d49af2b). Requests for access will be considered under the study's Data Access and Collaboration policy and governance process (https://www.ed.ac.uk/centre-reproductive-health/tebc/about-tebc/for-researchers/data-access-collaboration, James.Boardman{at}ed.ac.uk). The microbiome and participant metadata reported in this study cannot be deposited in a public repository due to them containing information that could compromise participant consent. Requests for raw neuroimaging data will similarly be considered under the study's Data Access and Collaboration policy and governance process: https://www.ed.ac.uk/centre-reproductive-health/tebc/about-tebc/for-researchers/data-access-collaboration. Code used for the data analysis in this paper is available here: https://git.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/jbrl/neonatal-microbiota-and-brain-dysmaturation. https://doi.org/10.7488/e65499db-2263-4d3c-9335-55ae6d49af2b