RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lost in Transplantation: Characterizing Racial Gaps in Physician Organ Offer Acceptance
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.14.24310395
DO 10.1101/2024.07.14.24310395
A1 Adam, Hammaad
A1 Bermea, Rene S.
A1 Yang, Ming Ying
A1 Celi, Leo Anthony
A1 Ghassemi, Marzyeh
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/16/2024.07.14.24310395.abstract
AB Background. There are known racial disparities in the organ transplant allocation system in the United States. However, prior work has yet to establish if transplant center decisions on offer acceptance—the final step in the allocation process— contribute to these disparities.Objective To estimate racial differences in the acceptance of organ offers by transplant center physicians on behalf of their patients.Design Retrospective cohort analysis using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) on patients who received an offer for a heart, liver, or lung transplant between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020.Setting Nationwide, waitlist-based.Patients 32,268 heart transplant candidates, 102,823 liver candidates, and 25,780 lung candidates, all aged 18 or older.Measurements 1) Association between offer acceptance and two race-based variables: candidate race and donor-candidate race match; 2) association between offer rejection and time to patient mortality.Results Black race was associated with significantly lower odds of offer acceptance for livers (OR=0.93, CI: 0.88-0.98) and lungs (OR=0.80, CI: 0.73-0.87). Donor-candidate race match was associated with significantly higher odds of offer acceptance for hearts (OR=1.11, CI: 1.06-1.16), livers (OR=1.10, CI: 1.06-1.13), and lungs (OR=1.13, CI: 1.07-1.19). Rejecting an offer was associated with lower survival times for all three organs (heart hazard ratio=1.16, CI: 1.09-1.23; liver HR=1.74, CI: 1.66-1.82; lung HR=1.21, CI: 1.15-1.28).Limitations Our study analyzed the observational SRTR dataset, which has known limitations.Conclusion Offer acceptance decisions are associated with inequity in the organ allocation system. Our findings demonstrate the additional barriers that Black patients face in accessing organ transplants and demonstrate the need for standardized practice, continuous distribution policies, and better organ procurement.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding from the MIT Jameel Clinic. This research was supported, in part, by Takeda Development Center Americas, INC. (successor in interest to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, INC.). RSB is supported by an NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (T32HL116275). MG is supported in part by a CIFAR AI Chair at the Vector Institute. LAC is funded by the National Institute of Health through the NIBIB R01 grant EB017205.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was granted full approval following expedited review by the Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects, the Institutional Review Board for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThis study used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR).