RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prospective classification of functional dependence: Insights from machine learning and 39,927 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.15.24310429
DO 10.1101/2024.07.15.24310429
A1 van Allen, Zachary M.
A1 Dionne, Nathalie
A1 Boisgontier, Matthieu P.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/15/2024.07.15.24310429.abstract
AB Objective Functional dependence is a multifactorial health condition that affects well-being and life expectancy. To better understand the mechanisms underlying functional dependence, we aimed to identify the variables that best prospectively classify adults with and without limitations in basic and instrumental activities of daily living.Methods A filtering approach was used to select the best predictors of functional status from 4,248 candidate predictors collected in 39,927 participants aged 44 to 88 years old at baseline. Several machine learning models using the selected baseline variables (2010-2015) were compared for their ability to classify participants by functional status (dependent vs. independent) at follow up (2018-2021) on a training dataset (n = 31,941) of participants from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. The best performing model was then examined on a test dataset (n = 7,986) to confirm its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.Results Eighteen baseline variables were identified as the best predictors of functional status at follow up. Logistic regression was the best performing model for classifying participants by functional status and achieved balanced accuracy of 81.9% on the test dataset. Older age, phycological distress, slow walking speed, perceived health, being retired, having a chronic condition, and never going for walks at baseline were associated with greater odds of being functionally dependent at follow-up. In contrast, the absence of functional limitations, greater grip strength, being a female and free of chronic conditions at baseline were associated with lower odds of being functionally dependent at follow-up.Conclusion Functional dependence can be best prospectively estimated by age, psychological distress, physical fitness, physical activity, chronic conditions, and sex. These predictors can estimate functional dependence more than 6 years in advance with high accuracy.Impact Such early identification of functional dependence allows sufficient time for the implementation of interventions designed to delay or prevent functional decline.Lay Summary Whether a patient will be dependent in 6 years can be predicted with good accuracy by 18 variables, including age, psychological distress, physical fitness, physical activity, chronic disease, and sex.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; LSA 94473), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the following Canadian provinces: Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec. Matthieu Boisgontier is supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; RGPIN-2021-03153), the CFI, Mitacs, and the Banting Discovery Foundation. Zachary van Allen is supported by a Mitacs Accelerate Postdoctoral Fellowship and the Banting Discovery Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging dataset (Baseline Tracking Dataset version 4.0, Baseline Comprehensive Dataset version 7.0, Follow-Up 2 dataset version 1.1) under application number 2304007. This dataset is available for researchers who meet the criteria (www.clsa-elcv.ca). CLSA is provided by the Government of Canada through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; LSA 94473), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and the following Canadian provinces: Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe dataset used in this study is available for researchers who meet the criteria for accessing CLSA (www.clsa-elcv.ca) and the R scripts are publicly available in Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12584730 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12584730