RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Long-term outcomes of TAVI patients undergoing different pacing modality: LBBAP versus RVP
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.12.24308735
DO 10.1101/2024.06.12.24308735
A1 Wang, Xi
A1 Xu, Yuanning
A1 Zeng, Lijun
A1 Tan, Kun
A1 Zhang, Xueli
A1 Han, Xu
A1 Xiong, Tianyuan
A1 Zhao, Zhengang
A1 Peng, Yong
A1 Wei, Jiafu
A1 Li, Qiao
A1 He, Sen
A1 Chen, Yong
A1 Zhou, Minggang
A1 Li, Xi
A1 Wei, Xin
A1 Liang, Yujia
A1 Zhou, Wenxia
A1 Jiang, Lingyun
A1 Liu, Xingbin
A1 Meng, Wei
A1 Zhou, Rui
A1 Xiong, Guojun
A1 Dai, Min
A1 Deng, Xiaojian
A1 Feng, Yuan
A1 Chen, Mao
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/12/2024.06.12.24308735.abstract
AB Background New-onset permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) is still a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with adverse clinical outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improves long-term clinical results compared to traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients requiring PPMI following TAVI.Methods A total of 237 consecutive patients undergoing RVP (N=117) or LBBAP (N=120) following TAVI were retrospectively included. Long-term outcomes including all-cause death, heart failure rehospitalization (HFH) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change compared to baseline were obtained until 5 years post-TAVI.Results The mean age of the overall population was 74 years with a mean surgical risk score as 4.4%. The paced QRS duration was significantly shorter in LBBAP group compared to RVP group (151 ± 18 vs. 122 ±12 ms, P<0.001). There was no difference between two groups in all-cause death (13.7% vs. 13.3%, adjusted HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.58; P=0.466) or the composite endpoint of death and HFH (29.9% vs. 19.2%, adjusted HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.70 to 2.13; P=0.476), however, the risk of HFH was significantly reduced in LBBAP group compared to RVP at 5 years after TAVI (21.4% vs. 7.5%, adjusted HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.01 to 5.08; P=0.048). There was a more marked evolution of LVEF over time in LBBAP group (P=0.046 for LVEF changes over time between groups).Conclusions LBBAP improved long-term clinical outcomes compared to RVP in patients undergoing PPMI after TAVI in terms of less HFH and better LVEF improvement.Competing Interest StatementY. Feng and M. Chen are consultants for Microport, Venus MedTech and Peijia Medical. All other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of West China Hospital, Institutional Review Board of Mianyang Central Hospital and Institutional Review Board of Deyang People's Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes