RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Perceptual and semantic deficits in face recognition in semantic dementia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.10.24310157
DO 10.1101/2024.07.10.24310157
A1 Yadollahikhales, Golnaz
A1 Mandelli, Maria Luisa
A1 Ezzes, Zoe
A1 Pillai, Janhavi
A1 Ratnasiri, Buddhika
A1 Baquirin, David Paul
A1 Miller, Zachary
A1 de Leon, Jessica
A1 Tee, Boon Lead
A1 Seeley, William
A1 Rosen, Howard
A1 Miller, Bruce
A1 Kramer, Joel
A1 Sturm, Virginia
A1 Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa
A1 Montembeault, Maxime
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/12/2024.07.10.24310157.abstract
AB State of the art Semantic dementia (SD) patients including semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and semantic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (sbvFTD) patients show semantic difficulties identifying faces and known people related to right anterior temporal lobe (ATL) atrophy. However, it remains unclear whether they also have perceptual deficits in face recognition.Methodology We selected 74 SD patients (54 with svPPA and predominant left ATL atrophy and 20 with sbvFTD and predominant right ATL atrophy) and 36 cognitively healthy controls (HC) from UCSF Memory and Aging Center. They underwent a perceptual face processing test (Benton facial recognition test-short version; BFRT-S), and semantic face processing tests (UCSF Famous people battery – Recognition, Naming, Semantic associations – pictures and words subtests), as well as structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Neural correlates with the task’s performance were conducted with a Voxel-based morphometry approach using CAT12.Results svPPA and sbvFTD patients were impaired on all semantic face processing tests, with sbvFTD patients performing significantly lower on the famous faces’ recognition task in comparison to svPPA, and svPPA performing significantly lower on the naming task in comparison to sbvFTD. These tasks predominantly correlated with gray matter (GM) volumes in the right and left ATL, respectively. Compared to HC, both svPPA and sbvFTD patients showed preserved performance on the perceptual face processing test (BFRT-S), and performance on the BFRT-S negatively correlated with GM volume in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS).Conclusion Our results suggest that early in the disease, with the atrophy mostly restricted to the anterior temporal regions, SD patients do not present with perceptual deficits. However, more severe SD cases with atrophy in right posterior temporal regions might show lower performance on face perception tests, in addition to the semantic face processing deficits. Early sparing of face perceptual deficits in SD patients, regardless of hemispheric lateralization, furthers our understanding of clinical phenomenology and therapeutical approaches of this complex disease.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by grants NINDS R01 NS050915, NIA P50 AG023501, NIA P01 AG019724, NIDCD K24 DC015544, NIA U01 AG052943, NIA R01 AG038791, NIA U54 NS092089, NIA U01 AG045390, K23DC018021. Additional funds include the Larry Hillblom Foundation and the Global Brain Health Institute. These supporting sources had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, nor were they involved in writing the paper or the decision to submit this report for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Written informed consent was obtained from all participants (or legally authorized representatives of participants) in the study and the institutional review board at University of California, San Francisco in the United States approved the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesPublic archiving is not yet permitted under the study’s IRB approval due to the sensitive nature of patient data, although we can share anonymized data. Specific requests can be submitted through the UCSF-MAC Resource (Request form: http://memory.ucsf.edu/resources/data). Following a UCSF-regulated procedure, access will be granted to designated individuals in line with ethical guidelines on the reuse of sensitive data. This would require submission of a Material Transfer Agreement, available at: https://icd.ucsf.edu/material-transfer-and-data-agreements. Commercial use will not be approved.