PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Ho, Joyce C
AU  - Joshi, Shalmali
AU  - Valverde, Eduardo
AU  - Wood, Kathryn
AU  - Grubb, Kendra
AU  - Leal, Miguel
AU  - Hertzberg, Vicki Stover
TI  - Machine learning is more accurate and biased than risk scoring tools in the prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
AID  - 10.1101/2024.07.05.24310013
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.07.05.24310013
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/07/2024.07.05.24310013.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/07/2024.07.05.24310013.full
AB  - Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery remains high and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Risk scoring tools have been developed to predict POAF, yet discrimination performance remains moderate. Machine learning (ML) models can achieve better performance but may exhibit performance heterogeneity across race and sex subpopulations. We evaluate 8 risk scoring tools and 6 ML models on a heterogeneous cohort derived from electronic health records. Our results suggest that ML models achieve higher discrimination yet are less fair, especially with respect to race. Our findings highlight the need for building accurate and fair ML models to facilitate consistent and equitable assessment of POAF risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by NIH Award 1R21HL156184.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study on de-identified data was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData provided in the present study are not available but the code used is available.POAFpost-operative atrial fibrillationAUROCarea under the receiver operating characteristic curveMLmachine learningSVMsupport vector machinesGBMgradient boosting machinesRFrandom forestsCABGcoronary artery bypass graft