PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lydeamore, Michael J AU - Wu, David AU - Donker, Tjibbe AU - Gorrie, Claire AU - Higgs, Charlie K AU - Easton, Marion AU - Hennessy, Daneeta AU - Geard, Nicholas AU - Howden, Benjamin P AU - Cooper, Ben S AU - Wilson, Andrew AU - Peleg, Anton Y AU - Stewardson, Andrew J TI - Changes in isolation guidelines for CPE patients results in only a mild reduction in required hospital beds AID - 10.1101/2024.07.04.24309973 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.07.04.24309973 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/05/2024.07.04.24309973.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/05/2024.07.04.24309973.full AB - Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are an emerging public health concern globally as they are resistant to a broad spectrum of antibiotics. Colonisation with CPE typically requires patients to be managed under ‘contact precautions’, which creates additional physical bed demands in healthcare facilities. This study examined the potential impact of revised isolation guidelines introduced in late 2023 in Victoria, Australia, that relaxed the requirement for indefinite isolation of CPE-colonised patients in contact precautions, based on admission of CPE-diagnosed cases prior to the guideline change. Our analysis showed that while the changes result in modest savings in the need for dedicated isolation rooms, they could reduce the duration of time individual patients spend in isolation by up to three weeks. However, ongoing investments to expand isolation capacity would still be required to accommodate the rising incidence of CPE.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1156742). A.J.S was supported by an Early Career Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1141398).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics permission was obtained from the Alfred Health ethics board, submission number 445/21.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, subject to relevant ethics guidelines and approvals.