PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Clark, Emma Virginia
AU  - LaNoue, Marianna
AU  - Clouse, Kate
AU  - Zuber, Alexandra
AU  - Neal, Jeremy
TI  - Relationship between midwifery density and midwifery regulatory environments in International Confederation of Midwives member countries
AID  - 10.1101/2024.07.02.24309863
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.07.02.24309863
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/05/2024.07.02.24309863.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/05/2024.07.02.24309863.full
AB  - Background Midwives are a cost-effective solution for reducing preventable maternal death, but barriers to their recruitment, training, deployment, and retention exist. Improved midwifery regulation is proposed to address these challenges through activities related to education and qualification, licensure, registration/re-licensure, and scope and conduct of practice. However, no quantitative analysis of the associations between midwifery regulation and workforce density in low- and middle-income countries has been conducted, limiting actionable insights for policymakers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between midwifery regulatory environments and midwifery workforce densities (midwives per 10,000 population) in International Confederation of Midwives member countries.Methods The study used secondary data from the 2019 Global Midwives’ Associations Map Survey to perform a cross-sectional analysis of 103 International Confederation of Midwives member countries. To operationalize the strength of a country’s midwifery regulatory environment, we used a previously developed Midwifery Regulatory Environment Index. We conducted multivariable linear regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between this index and country-level midwifery density, available from the National Health Workforce Accounts.Results Midwifery regulatory environments are significantly associated with midwifery workforce densities across countries. For every 1-point increase in the Midwifery Regulatory Environment Index (indicating activities in at least one additional regulatory domain), midwifery density increased by 0.66 midwives per 10,000 population (p = 0.011). This effect decreased to 0.41 midwives per 10,000 population yet remained significant even after controlling for country level income, per capita health spending, income inequality, and human development index (p = 0.04).Conclusion Stronger regulatory environments are associated with higher densities of midwives, even when controlling for potential confounding factors such as country-level income and health spending. This relationship suggests that policymakers should invest in midwifery regulation to improve maternal health outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Vanderbilt University Medical Center Institutional Review BoardI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. https://apps.who.int/nhwaportal/ https://www.globalmidwiveshub.org/