RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 "Stroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (SPSE): Concepts, Definitions, Models, Implementation Strategies, Indicators, and Frameworks - A Systematic Scoping Review"
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.03.24309878
DO 10.1101/2024.07.03.24309878
A1 Khankeh, Hamidreza
A1 Guyatt, Gordon
A1 Shirozhan, Shima
A1 Roudini, Juliet
A1 Rackoll, Torsten
A1 Dirnagl, Ulrich
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/04/2024.07.03.24309878.abstract
AB Background Involving stroke patients in clinical research through patient engagement aims to ensure that studies are patient-centered, and may help ensure they are feasible, ethical, and credible, ultimately leading to enhanced trust and communication between researchers and the patient community. In this study, we have conducted a scoping review to identify existing evidence and gaps in SPSE.Methods The five-step approach outlined by Arksey and O’Malley, in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, provided the structure for this review. To find relevant articles, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to February 2024. Additionally, the review team conducted a hand search using Google Scholar, key journals, and references of highly relevant articles. Reviewers conducted primary and secondary screening, ultimately selecting English-language articles with available full texts that met the eligibility criteria. Reviewers extracted data from these articles into a table designed and tested by the research team.Results Of 1,002 articles initially identified, 21 proved eligible. Stakeholder engagement primarily occurred during the design phase of studies and within the studies using qualitative methodologies. Although the engagement of stakeholders in the research process is increasing, practice regarding terminology and principles of implementation remains variable. Researchers have recognized the benefits of stakeholder engagement, but have also faced numerous challenges that often arise during the research process.Conclusion The current study identifies stakeholder groups and the benefits and challenges researchers face in implementing their engagement. Given existing challenges and limited specific models or frameworks, it is recommended to explore applied recommendations for stakeholder engagement in future studies, that may enhance stakeholder engagement, overcome obstacles, and unify researchers’ understanding of engagement and implementation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02347-6 Funding StatementDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript PSEPatient and Stakeholder EngagementPPIPatient and Public InvolvementSPSEStroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement