RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Large-scale analysis of the medical discourse on rheumatoid arthritis: complementing a socio-anthropologic analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.07.02.24309823
DO 10.1101/2024.07.02.24309823
A1 Santoro, Mario
A1 Nardini, Christine
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/03/2024.07.02.24309823.abstract
AB The medical discourse, entails the analysis of the modalities, far from unbiased, by which hypotheses and results are laid out in the dissemination of findings in scientific publications, giving different emphases on the background, relevance, robustness, and assumptions that the audience should take for granted. While this concept is extensively studied in socio-anthropology, it remains generally overlooked within the scientific community conducting the research. Yet, analyzing the discourse is crucial for several reasons: to frame policies that take into account an appropriately large screen of medical opportunities, to avoid overseeing promising but less walked paths, to grasp different types of representations of diseases, therapies, patients, and other stakeholders, understanding and being aware of how these very terms are conditioned by time, culture and so on. While socio-anthropologists traditionally use manual curation methods, automated approaches like topic modeling offer a complementary way to explore the vast and ever-growing body of medical literature. In this work, we propose a complementary analysis of the medical discourse regarding the therapies offered for rheumatoid arthritis using topic modeling and large language model-based emotion and sentiment analysis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript