RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Optimizing Genetic Testing Strategy for Suspected Attenuated Adenomatous Polyposis: Effective Solutions in Public Health Systems
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.28.24308416
DO 10.1101/2024.06.28.24308416
A1 García-Simón, Natalia
A1 Valentín, Fátima
A1 Royuela, Ana
A1 Hidalgo-Calero, Beatriz
A1 Blázquez-Martín, Ricardo
A1 de-Miguel-Reyes, Montserrat
A1 Sánchez-Zapardiel, José M
A1 Adán-Merino, Luisa
A1 Rodríguez-Festa, Alejandro
A1 Gallego-Gil, Patricia
A1 Mediavilla-Medel, Pilar
A1 Quiñonero-Moreno, Laura
A1 Gutiérrez, Lourdes
A1 Herreros-de-Tejada, Alberto
A1 Sánchez, Antonio
A1 Provencio, Mariano
A1 Romero, Atocha
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/01/2024.06.28.24308416.abstract
AB BACKGROUND Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) represent key hereditary attenuated adenomatous polyposis syndromes, with APC and MUTYH being the associated genes. While guidelines recommend genetic testing based on polyp count for diagnosing these syndromes, age is often overlooked despite its influence on polyp prevalence.AIM To enhance genetic testing strategies for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis by combining polyp count and age in a probability calculator.METHODS Retrospective study of adult patients referred to NGS genetic testing for suspected attenuated adenomatous polyposis (accumulated history of <100 adenomas) (discovery cohort, N=138). Data collected included age, adenoma count at the time of genetic testing, and test results. Multivariable logistic regression model was developed to link a positive genetic test result with age and adenoma count. The model was externally validated with populations from two tertiary hospitals in our region (validation cohort, N=259).RESULTS In the discovery cohort, 13 (9.4%) patients tested positive for pathogenic mutations. Positive cases were younger (odds ratio (OR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%IC): 0.86-0.96) and developed more adenomas (OR: 1.08, 95%IC: 1.04-1.13) compared to negative cases. The logistic regression model combining age and polyp count demonstrated an AUC of 0.92. Using a cutoff probability of 3.5%, the model achieved 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity in identifying positive cases. In the external validation, the model accurately predicted 14 out of 16 positive cases (88%). The remaining two positive cases were a patient with an AXIN2 mutation in heterozygosis, and a patient with a NTHL1 mutation in homozygosis. Performance evaluation of both hospitals yielded AUC values of 0.77 and 0.90.CONCLUSIONS Older individuals, particularly those with few polyps, may have diminished chances of detecting hereditary syndromes. Incorporating age as a criterion for genetic testing referral has the potential to refine patient selection and improve cost-effectiveness.Core tip This retrospective muli-center observational study aims to investigate the weight of age and polyp count on patients diagnosed with hereditary attenuated adenomatous polyposis syndrome compared to those with sporadic polyposis. Base on this, a probability calculator has been developed to enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing protocols for attenuated adenomatous polyposis syndromes within public health systems.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is upported by Rio Hortega Fellowship grant no. CM22/00213 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and by PFIS fellowship grant no. FI22/00321, ISCIII.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of Puerta de Hierro University Hospital gave ethical approval for this work. (internal code: PI_48/24)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors https://investigacionpuertadehierro.com/calculadora-poliposis/