PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rotte, Nadja
AU  - Dunleavy, Jessica E.M.
AU  - Runkel, Michelle D.
AU  - Fietz, Daniela
AU  - Pilatz, Adrian
AU  - Kuss, Johanna
AU  - Dicke, Ann-Kristin
AU  - Winge, Sofia B.
AU  - Persio, Sara Di
AU  - Ruckert, Christian
AU  - Nordhoff, Verena
AU  - Schuppe, Hans-Christian
AU  - Almstrup, Kristian
AU  - Kliesch, Sabine
AU  - Neuhaus, Nina
AU  - Stallmeyer, Birgit
AU  - O’Bryan, Moira K.
AU  - Tüttelmann, Frank
AU  - Friedrich, Corinna
TI  - Genotype-specific differences in infertile men due to loss-of-function variants in <em>M1AP</em> or <em>ZZS</em> genes
AID  - 10.1101/2024.03.20.24304490
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.03.20.24304490
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/01/2024.03.20.24304490.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/07/01/2024.03.20.24304490.full
AB  - Male infertility and meiotic arrest have been linked to M1AP, the gene encoding meiosis I associated protein. In mice, M1AP interacts with the ZZS proteins SHOC1, TEX11, and SPO16, which promote DNA class I crossover formation during meiosis. To determine whether M1AP and ZZS proteins are involved in human male infertility by disrupting class I crossover formation, we screened for biallelic or hemizygous loss-of-function (LoF) variants in the encoding human genes to select men with a presumed protein deficiency; we compiled N=10 men for M1AP, N=4 for SHOC1, N=9 for TEX11, and the first homozygous LoF variant in SPO16 in an infertile man. After in-depth characterisation of the testicular phenotype of these men, we identified gene-specific meiotic impairments: men with SHOC1, TEX11, or SPO16 deficiency shared an early meiotic arrest lacking haploid germ cells. All men with LoF variants in M1AP exhibited a predominant metaphase I arrest with rare haploid round spermatids, and six men even produced sporadic elongated spermatids. These differences were explained by different recombination failures: abrogated SHOC1, TEX11, or SPO16 led to incorrect synapsis of homologous chromosomes and unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). On the contrary, abolished M1AP did not affect synapsis and DSB repair but led to a reduced number of class I crossover events. Notably, medically assisted reproduction resulted in the birth of a healthy child, offering the possibility of fatherhood to men with LoF variants in M1AP. Our study establishes M1AP as an important, but not essential, functional enhancer in the network of ZZS-mediated meiotic recombination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was carried out within the frame of the German Research Foundation-funded Clinical Research Unit Male Germ Cells (DFG CRU326, project number 329621271) to CF, FT, NN and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) to FT and MOB (project ID 57511796).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All individuals gave written informed consent compliant with local requirements. The MERGE study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Aerztekammer Westfalen-Lippe and the Medical Faculty Muenster: Muenster #2010-578-f-S, #2012-555-f-S; Giessen #26/11), study of GEMINI-377 was approved by the ethics committee for the Capital Region in Denmark #H-2-2014-103, all in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes