PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sakyi, L
AU  - Ae-Ngibise, KA
AU  - Adwan-Kamara, L
AU  - Weobong, Ben
AU  - Lund, Crick
TI  - Care delivery in the context of district mental healthcare plans (DMHP) in Ghana: experiences of primary health care workers and service users
AID  - 10.1101/2024.06.30.24309723
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.06.30.24309723
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/30/2024.06.30.24309723.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/30/2024.06.30.24309723.full
AB  - Background The integration of mental healthcare into primary healthcare services is an effective way to addressing the substantial treatment gap for mental health conditions in low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. In Ghana, District Mental Healthcare Plans (DMHPs) were developed and implemented in three districts over a 2-year period. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of mental health service users and primary healthcare workers regarding the implementation of the DMHPs.Methods The study employed a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews with 32 service users and 28 primary healthcare providers in the three demonstration districts. Participants were purposively sampled. Interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis combining inductive and deductive approaches.Results Three main themes were identified: 1) Factors supporting DMHP implementation, including capacity building, collaboration, awareness creation, and acceptability; 2) Challenges impacting DMHP implementation, such as inadequate resources and medication shortages; and 3) Impacts of the DMHPs, including improved access to care, reduced relapse, enhanced daily functioning, and reduced stigma. Some district-level variations were noted in the intensity of challenges and impacts.Conclusion The DMHPs showed promise in improving mental healthcare in primary care settings in Ghana. However, addressing resource constraints and medication shortages, and sustaining capacity building and awareness creation efforts, will be crucial for successful scale-up. The perspectives of service users and healthcare providers offer valuable insights for policy makers and practitioners aiming to enhance integrated mental healthcare.Strengths and limitations of this study⇒ This study is the first in Ghana to explore in-depth the experiences of healthcare workers and service users in implementation of DMHPs.⇒ Using qualitative design provide more nuanced understanding of factors supporting implementation of DMHP which would have been more difficult to do using quantitative methods.⇒ The study reported from a relatively small sample size from only 3 districts from 261 districts in Ghana. While this sample size provided valuable insights, it may not cover the wide and diverse experiences of healthcare workers and service users involved in the DMHPs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the United Kingdom Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office(https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/foreign-commonwealth-development-office) (award number: PO8604). However, the funders did not play any role in the study design, data acquisition and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committees/IRB of Kings College London and the Ghana Health Service gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article. Further data in the form of deidentified participant data such as interview transcripts are stored in a secure server and are available on reasonable request by emailing the corresponding author.