RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rapid Scoping and Expanded Grey Literature Review for the covid-19 Pandemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.21.20109710
DO 10.1101/2020.05.21.20109710
A1 Douma, Matthew J
A1 Mackenzie, Ella
A1 Loch, Tess
A1 Tan, Maria C.
A1 Anderson, Dustin
A1 Picard, Christopher
A1 Milovanovic, Lazar
A1 O’Dochartaigh, Domhnall
A1 Brindley, Peter G
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.21.20109710.abstract
AB Prone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation A Rapid Scoping and Expanded Grey Literature Review for the COVID-19 PandemicAim To rapidly identify and summarize the available science on prone resuscitation. To determine the value of undertaking a systematic review on this topic; and to identify knowledge gaps to aid future research, education and guidelines.Methods This review was guided by specific methodological framework and reporting items (PRISMA-ScR). We included studies, cases and grey literature regarding prone position and CPR/cardiac arrest. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar. Expanded grey literature searching included internet search engine, targeted websites and social media.Results Of 453 identified studies, 24 (5%) studies met our inclusion criteria. There were four prone resuscitation-relevant studies examining: blood and tidal volumes generated by prone compressions; prone compression quality metrics on a manikin; and chest computed tomography scans for compression landmarking. Twenty case reports/series described the resuscitation of 25 prone patients. Prone compression quality was assessed by invasive blood pressure monitoring, exhaled carbon dioxide and pulse palpation. Recommended compression location was zero-to-two vertebral segments below the scapulae. Twenty of 25 cases (80%) survived prone resuscitation, although few cases reported long term outcome. Seven cases described full neurological recovery.Conclusion This scoping review did not identify sufficient evidence to justify a systematic review or modified resuscitation guidelines. It remains reasonable to initiate resuscitation in the prone position if turning the patient supine would lead to delays or risk to providers or patients. Prone resuscitation quality can be judged using end-tidal CO2, and arterial pressure tracing, with patients turned supine if insufficient.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is unfunded.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This review is exempt from IRB oversight.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data is included in the article and appendices.