RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.06.24.24308902
DO 10.1101/2024.06.24.24308902
A1 Ayre, Susannah K.
A1 Johnston, Elizabeth A.
A1 Bourdaniotis, Xanthia E.
A1 Zajdlewicz, Leah
A1 Beesley, Vanessa L.
A1 Pole, Jason D.
A1 Hansen, Aaron
A1 Gasper, Harry
A1 Cossio, Danica
A1 Lock, Gemma
A1 Goodwin, Belinda C.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/26/2024.06.24.24308902.abstract
AB Purpose This study formed the development stage of a population-based survey aiming to: (i) understand the needs and experiences of people affected by cancer in Queensland, Australia and (ii) recruit a pool of participants for ongoing cancer survivorship research. The current study aimed to co-design and test a single qualitative survey question and study invitation materials to maximise acceptability of, and participation in, the survey and future research.Methods Fifty-two community members participated across 15 co-design workshops and 20 pretest interviews. During workshops, participants generated and refined ideas for an open-ended survey question and provided feedback on a study invitation letter. The use of a single, open-ended question aims to minimise participant burden while collecting rich information about needs and experiences. The research team then shortlisted the question ideas and revised study invitation materials based on workshop feedback. Next, using interviews, community members were asked to respond to a shortlisted question to test its interpretability and relevance and to review revised invitation materials. Content analysis of participant feedback was used to identify principles for designing study materials.Results Ten principles for designing qualitative survey questions were identified from participant feedback. Key principles included: define the question timeframe and scope; provide reassurance that responses are valid and valued; and use simple wording. For the study invitation materials, 11 principles were identified, including these key principles: communicate empathy and sensitivity; facilitate reciprocal benefit; and include a ‘human element’. The qualitative survey question and study invitation materials created using these principles were considered relevant and acceptable for use in a population-based survey.Conclusions Through community consultation and co-design, this study identified principles for designing qualitative data collection and invitation materials for use in cancer survivorship research. These principles can be applied by other researchers to develop study materials that are sensitive to the needs and preferences of community members.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Cancer Council Queensland.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the University of Southern Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (ref: ETH2023-0140).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.