RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 OCCULT INTRACRANIAL INJURIES ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) HEAD SCANS IN INFANTS INVESTIGATED FOR SUSPECTED PHYSICAL ABUSE: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.21.20106948
DO 10.1101/2020.05.21.20106948
A1 Daley, H
A1 Smith, H
A1 McEvedy, S
A1 King, R
A1 Andrews, ET
A1 Hawkins, F
A1 Guppy, N
A1 Kiryazova, T
A1 Macleod, R
A1 Blake, E
A1 Harrison, R
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.21.20106948.abstract
AB Background United Kingdom national guidelines recommend that investigation of infants (aged <12 months) with suspected physical abuse should always include computed tomography (CT) head scans. Studies report a range of yields for occult intracranial injuries in infants.Aims To gauge the yield of occult intracranial injuries on CT head scans in infants who underwent radiological investigations for suspected physical abuse, and compare selected demographic, clinical and radiological features in infants with and without intracranial injuries.Method A retrospective cross-sectional review of infants investigated for suspected physical abuse in Wessex, England. The main outcome measure was yield of occult intracranial injuries on CT head scan. Occult injuries were defined as previously unsuspected CT head scan findings of postnatal intracranial injury.Results Of 363 CT head scans meeting study criteria, 68 were in infants with neurological signs or skull fractures, 36 of these had intracranial injuries. Of the 295 without neurological signs or skull fractures, just 1 infant had CT features of an intracranial injury. This was the only occult intracranial injury found. It was a small cortical haemorrhage found to be consistent with a contracoup injury from an accidental fall. No additional demographic, clinical or radiological features were associated with intracranial injury.Conclusion In suspected physical abuse, CT head scans should be carried out in infants who present with neurological signs, or who have skull fractures identified on X-ray. However, we question the benefit of performing CT head scans routinely in infants who have no signs of head injury.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received to support the work presented here. No authors or their institutions at any time received payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work (including but not limited to grants, data monitoring board, study design, manuscript preparation, statistical analysis, etc.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS Health Research Authority, East of England - Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee (19/EE/0355).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article