PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Deng, Liehua AU - Lei, Shaoqing AU - Jiang, Fang AU - Lubarsky, David A. AU - Zhang, Liangqing AU - Liu, Danyong AU - Han, Conghua AU - Zhou, Dunrong AU - Wang, Zheng AU - Sun, Xiaocong AU - Zhang, Yuanli AU - Cheung, Chi Wai AU - Wang, Sheng AU - Xia, Zhong-yuan AU - Applegate, Richard L AU - Liu, Hong AU - Tang, Jing AU - Xia, Zhengyuan TI - The Outcome Impact of Early vs Late HFNC Oxygen Therapy in Elderly Patients with COVID-19 and ARDS AID - 10.1101/2020.05.23.20111450 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.23.20111450 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.23.20111450.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/26/2020.05.23.20111450.full AB - Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide. High-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) is a major oxygen supporting therapy for severely ill patients, but information regarding the timing of HFNC application is scarce, especially in elderly patients. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 110 elderly patients (≥65 years) who received HFNC from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, People’s Hospital of Xiantao City and Chinese Medicine Hospital of Shishou City in Hubei Province, China, and from Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang City, People’s Hospital of Maoming City in Guangdong Province, China.Of the 110 patients, the median age was 71 years (IQR, 68-78) and 59.1% was male. Thirty-eight patients received HFNC when 200 mmHg < PO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg (early HFNC group), and 72 patients received HFNC treatment when 100 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg (late HFNC group). Compared with the late HFNC group, patients in the early HFNC group had a lower likelihood of developing severe ARDS, longer time from illness onset to severe ARDS and shorter duration of viral shedding after illness onset, as well as shorter lengths of ICU and hospital stay. Twenty-four patients died during hospitalization, of whom 22 deaths (30.6%) were in the late HFNC group and 2(5.3%) in the early HFNC group. It is concluded that the Prognosis was better in severely ill elderly patients with COVID-19 receiving early compared to late HFNC. This suggests HFNC could be considered early in this disease process.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors' work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 813000674, 81670770, 81970247).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of participating institutes (PJ2020-005), and the informed consent was waived by the Medical Ethical CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWith the permission of the corresponding authors, the participant data without names and identifiers can be provided, but not the study protocol and statistical analysis plan. The data will be available for others to request after publication of study findings. The research team will provide an email address for communication once the data can be made public. The corresponding authors have the right to decide whether or not to share the data based on research objectives and plan provided.