PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Bhatia, Natasha S. AU - Kunzweiler, Stephany AU - Conley, Christopher AU - Kim, Ki H. AU - Adewuyi, Adenike A. AU - Mondriguez-Gonzalez, Antonio AU - Wolfe, Lisa F. AU - Kwasny, Mary AU - Franz, Colin K. TI - The Predictive Value of Diaphragm Muscle Ultrasound for Ventilator Weaning Outcomes after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Case Series AID - 10.1101/2024.02.28.24303260 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.02.28.24303260 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/19/2024.02.28.24303260.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/19/2024.02.28.24303260.full AB - Objectives Neuromuscular respiratory failure after cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) can lead to dependence on an invasive mechanical ventilator. Ventilator-free breathing after cSCI is associated with improved morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. We investigated the use of diaphragm muscle ultrasound to predict ventilator weaning outcomes after cSCI.Methods This is a retrospective case series conducted at a university-affiliated freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility. We identified patients with cSCI who had a tracheostomy and were dependent on an invasive mechanical ventilator at the time of admission to inpatient rehabilitation. A diaphragm muscle ultrasound was performed, which included measurements of the thickness of the diaphragm and a calculation of the thickening ratio (TR), which reflects diaphragm muscle contraction. The primary outcome measure was the need for mechanical ventilation at time of discharge from the inpatient rehabilitation facility. Successful ventilator weaning was defined as either daytime or full 24-hour ventilator-free breathing.Results Of the 21 patients enrolled, 11 (52%) were able to wean successfully (partially or fully) from the ventilator. Of the ultrasound measurements that were taken, the TR was the optimal predictor for ventilator weaning outcomes. A threshold of TR≥1.2 as the maximum hemidiaphragm measurement had a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.90 for predicting ventilator weaning.Conclusion Normal diaphragm contractility (TR ≥ 1.2) as determined by diaphragm muscle ultrasound is a strong positive predictor for successful ventilator weaning in patients with cSCI.Utilizing diaphragm ultrasound, rehabilitation physicians can set precision rehabilitation goals regarding ventilator weaning for inpatients with respiratory failure after cSCI, potentially improving both outcomes and quality of life.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementBelle Carnell Regenerative Neurorehabilitation Fund. Catalyst Grant Program at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study received approval from Northwestern University's Institutional Review Board (IRB) under approval number STU23625789. This included a waiver of informed consent, justified by the minimal risk to subjects and the impracticality of obtaining consent for this review. The IRB's approval ensured compliance with ethical principles, including patient privacy and data confidentiality, in line with the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors