PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Leiulfsrud, Annelie Schedin AU - Ellinggard, Kristian Bernhof AU - Post, Marcel W.M. AU - Arora, Mohit AU - Leiulfsrud, Håkon TI - Experienced inclusion and recognition amongst people with spinal cord injury: A comparative study in Norway, The Netherlands, and Australia AID - 10.1101/2024.06.16.24308999 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.16.24308999 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.16.24308999.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.16.24308999.full AB - Background The aim of this article is to study inclusion and recognition experienced amongst people with a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in Norway, The Netherlands, and Australia. This is approached both from the perspectives of an interest in the impact of mobility limitations versus social attitudes, and from a consideration of differences between societies.Methods The data derive from the core questionnaire of International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey with extended national modules on the attitudes and values of respondents from Norway, The Netherlands, and Australia. The data gathered in 2017-18 include 2,450 participants aged 18 years or older. The data are analysed and presented with descriptive statistics and OLS regression analyses. In order to explore our main questions, we run regression controlling for country effects in addition exploring within country effects.Results Mobility limitations are a substantially weaker predictor of self-perceived inclusion and recognition than experiences of negative attitudes towards disabled people. Stereotypical attitudes and norms in society are shown to have various impacts on inclusion in the three countries. The Norwegian respondents report overall better results on inclusion and recognition than respondents in Australia and The Netherlands, illustrating the importance of national contexts.Conclusions Challenges associated with inclusion, recognition, and respect after SCI need to be defined in a language broader than mobility limitations and stereotypical attitudes towards people with an SCI. The main road to both inclusion and recognition in society is primarily linked to job and educational status, in addition to family and friends. The results are of particular interest as measures to support reintegration into society, including a strengthening of labour market integration programs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethical Committees who approved the study were: Regionale komiteer for medisinsk og helsefaglig forskningsetikk (Regional committees for medical and health research ethics) in Norway (Reference number 2016/1184), Medish Ethische Toetsingscommisie (Medical Research Ethical Committee) in Utrecht, the Netherlands (Reference number 17/539) and Northern Sydney Local Health District, Australia (RESP/16/344).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData availability: See InSCI. 2017. “International Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey – What is InSCI?”. URL: https://insci.network/insci/T1/en/what_is_insci.php. In SCI data are available on request. For more information about the dataset used to analyse the material presented in the paper, please contact Annelie S. Leiulfsrud at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) by email: annelie.s.leiulfsrud{at}ntnu.no.