PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wang, Xin AU - Karagounis, Sotiris AU - Shringarpure, Suyash S. AU - Srivas, Rohith AU - Su, Qiaojuan Jane AU - , AU - Vacic, Vladimir AU - Pitts, Steven J. AU - Auton, Adam TI - The impact on clinical success from the 23andMe cohort AID - 10.1101/2024.06.17.24309059 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.17.24309059 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.17.24309059.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/18/2024.06.17.24309059.full AB - 90% of therapeutic programs that enter clinical trials ultimately fail. Human genetic variation provides a set of “natural experiments” that can inform successful strategies for therapeutic discovery. Previous work has estimated that drug targets with human genetics supported mechanisms have a 2-3x increased likelihood of succeeding in the clinic compared to those without. 23andMe, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer genetics company that has created a human genetics dataset approximately an order of magnitude larger in sample size than current publically available cohorts. As of 2024, 23andMe has approximately 15 million individuals with genotype and phenotype data, of which ∼80% consent to participation in research. In this work, we explore how both the scale of the genetic data and improved methods to link genetic associations to putative causal genes impact the prediction of clinical success. Comparing the total number of target-indication pairs that have reached at least phase I that are also supported by genetic evidence, the number of target-indication pairs with support from 23andMe is 60% greater than that with support from all GWAS datasets in the public domain. Including 23andMe genetic evidence approximately doubles the number of target-indication pairs in the clinic that are supported by human genetics. Furthermore, we show that genetic associations derived from entirely self-reported phenotypes are 2-3x enriched for clinical success, just as for clinically derived phenotypes. In contrast to conclusions from the recent publication of Minikel et al., we found that minor allele frequencies and effect sizes from GWAS influence the relative success estimates for program approvals, and that drug programs supported by rare and large effect associations have greater (3-4x) likelihood to be approved compared to common variant associations with small effects. Finally, improved gene mapping to identify the likely causal genes underlying genetic associations can result in up to 4-5x enrichment for trial success. With the increased power and scale of the 23andMe genetic dataset, we identify an expansive set of opportunities that may be pursued in the clinic, emphasizing the importance of cohort size and gene mapping confidence in deriving clinical value.Competing Interest StatementX.W., S.K., S.S.S., R.S., Q.J.S, V.V., S.J.P., A.A. are employed by and hold stock or stock options in 23andMe, Inc.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Participants provided informed consent and volunteered to participate in the research online, under a protocol approved by the external AAHRPP-accredited IRB, Ethical & Independent (E&I) Review Services. As of 2022, E&I Review Services is part of Salus IRB (https://www.versiticlinicaltrials.org/salusirb). All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations, including the Declaration of Helsinki.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData sharing pertaining to 23andMe data supporting the findings of this study may be made available upon reasonable request or collaboration. Non-23andMe data are publicly available. Download links: OpenTargets - https://github.com/opentargets/genetics-gold-standards/, Pharmaprojects and benchmarking datasets - https://github.com/ericminikel/genetic_support, Weeks et al. - https://www.finucanelab.org/data.