PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Caffaratti, Hugo AU - Slater, Ben AU - Shaheen, Nour AU - Rhone, Ariane AU - Calmus, Ryan AU - Kritikos, Michael AU - Kumar, Sukhbinder AU - Dlouhy, Brian AU - Oya, Hiroyuki AU - Griffiths, Tim AU - Boes, Aaron D. AU - Trapp, Nicholas AU - Kaiser, Marcus AU - Sallet, Jérôme AU - Banks, Matthew I. AU - Howard, Matthew A. AU - Zanaty, Mario AU - Petkov, Christopher I. TI - Neuromodulation with Ultrasound: Hypotheses on the Directionality of Effects and a Community Resource AID - 10.1101/2024.06.14.24308829 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.06.14.24308829 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/15/2024.06.14.24308829.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/15/2024.06.14.24308829.full AB - Low-intensity Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) is a promising non-invasive technique for deep-brain stimulation and focal neuromodulation. Research with animal models and computational modelling has raised the possibility that TUS can be biased towards enhancing or suppressing neural function. Here, we first conduct a systematic review of human TUS studies for perturbing neural function and alleviating brain disorders. We then collate a set of hypotheses on the directionality of TUS effects and conduct an initial meta-analysis on the human TUS study reported outcomes to date (n = 32 studies, 37 experiments). We find that parameters such as the duty cycle show some predictability regarding whether the targeted area’s function is likely to be enhanced or suppressed. Given that human TUS sample sizes are exponentially increasing, we recognize that results can stabilize or change as further studies are reported. Therefore, we conclude by establishing an Iowa-Newcastle (inTUS) resource for the systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomes to support further hypothesis testing for greater precision in brain stimulation and neuromodulation with TUS.HighlightsSystematic review of human TUS studies for enhancing or suppressing neural functionCollated set of hypotheses on using TUS to bias towards enhancement or suppressionMeta-analysis results identify parameters that may bias the directionality of effectsTUS resource established for systematic reporting of TUS parameters and outcomesCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSupported by National Institutes of Health USA (R01 DC04290), National Science Foundation (2342847) and Medical Research Council (UK). Ben Slater is supported by a BBSRC UK PhD studentship. M.K. was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/W004488/1 and EP/X01925X/1) and the Guangci Professorship Program of Rui Jin Hospital (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets and R script generated in this study have been deposited in the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/arqp8/ in the Caffaratti_et_al_inTUS_Resource folder.