PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Killett, Anne
AU  - Micklewright, Kerry
AU  - Carroll, Rachael
AU  - Akdur, Gizdem
AU  - Allinson, Emily
AU  - Crellin, Liz
AU  - de Corte, Kaat
AU  - Fox, Margaret
AU  - Hanratty, Barbara
AU  - Irvine, Lisa
AU  - Jones, Liz
AU  - Auburn Mere, Marlene Kelly
AU  - Lloyd, Therese
AU  - Meyer, Julienne
AU  - Spilsbury, Karen
AU  - Towers, Ann-Marie
AU  - Tracey, Freya
AU  - Wilmott, John
AU  - Goodman, Claire
TI  - Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes
AID  - 10.1101/2024.06.10.24308688
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.06.10.24308688
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/11/2024.06.10.24308688.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/11/2024.06.10.24308688.full
AB  - Introduction Information on care home residents is captured in lots of datasets (care home records, GP records, community nursing etc) but little of this information is currently analysed in a way that is useful for care providers, current or future residents and families or that realises the potential of data to enhance care provision. The DACHA study aimed to develop and test a minimum data set (MDS) which would bring together data that is useful to support and improve care and facilitate research. It is that utility that underscores the importance of meaningful public involvement with the range of groups of people affected. This paper analyses the public involvement of family members of care home residents and care home staff through a Public Involvement (PI) Panel.Objectives The objective for the PI activities was to consistently bring the knowledge and perspectives of family members and care home staff to influence the ongoing design and conduct of the DACHA study.Methods The bespoke methods of PI included a dedicated PI team and a PI Panel of public involvement contributors. Meetings were recorded and minutes agreed, resulting actions were tracked, and reflections on the PI recorded. A democratic, social relations approach was used to frame the analysis.Results A PI panel met 17 times. All meetings included both family members and care home staff. The public involvement deepened the research team’s understanding of the data environment in care homes, influenced the inclusion of quality of life and community health data in the pilot MDS and shaped research practices with care homes. Some panel members expressed personal and professional development from their involvement. Expectations of what the project could achieve had to be negotiated.Conclusions PI shaped the design and conduct of the DACHA study, grounding it in the needs and perspectives of people using and providing social care. Data research has a huge responsibility to accurately incorporate relevant public perspectives. There is an implicit assumption that records and data are objective and “speak for themselves” however there can be unintended consequences from introduction of new data requirements in practice.Patient or Public Contribution Public contributors to this manuscript include family members of older people living in care homes and staff of care homes. The wider study also involved as the public, older people living in care homes. Public contributors helped develop the project, contributed throughout the conduct of the study and some chose to be involved in preparing this manuscript.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study/project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Service Research and Delivery programme (HS&DR NIHR127234) and supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East of England. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes