PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - liu, Yanxia
AU  - Cao, Zhengan
AU  - Chen, Mei
AU  - Zhong, Yan
AU  - Luo, Yuhao
AU  - Shi, Gang
AU  - Xiang, Hongxia
AU  - Luo, Jianping
AU  - Zhou, Hongwei
TI  - Effect of Heat inactivation on Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR of the SARS-COV-2 Detection
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.19.20101469
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.19.20101469
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.19.20101469.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.19.20101469.full
AB  - Background Real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) is commonly used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection. Heat inactivation prior to nucleic acid isolation may allow safe testing, while the effects of heat inactivation on SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR detection result need to be determined.Methods 14 positive nasopharyngeal swab specimens were inactivated at 56°C for 30min, 56°C for 60min, 60°C for 30min, 60°C for 75min, and 100°C for 10min, and another 2 positive nasopharyngeal swab specimens were also inactivated at 100°C for 10min, 100°C for 30min, 100°C for 60min, after which the samples were isolated and detected by rRT-PCR.Results All 14 heat treated samples remained positive. The range of threshold cycle (Ct) values observed when detecting ORF1a/b was 27.228-34.011 in heat-treated samples, while 25.281-34.861 in unheated samples, and the range of threshold cycle (Ct) values observed at the time of detecting N was 25.777-33.351 in heat-treated samples, while 24.1615-35.433 in unheated samples, on basis of which it showed no statistical difference otherwise a good correlation of Ct values between the heat-inactivated samples and the untreated samples. However, the 2 samples inactivated at 100°C 30min, 100°C 60min turned into negative.Conclusions Heat inactivation at 56°C for 30min, 56°C for 60min, 60°C for 30min, 60°C for 75min, and 100°C for 10min shall not affect the detection results of Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR of the SARS-COV2. Furthermore, it is recommended to inactive nasopharyngeal swab specimens 10min at 100°C before RNA extraction in consideration of efficiency and reliable results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors are funded by the NSFC 81925026, 82041007.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesall data referred to in the manuscript is availability.